Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30701422›Full record

ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2019

The correct measurement of oxygen saturation at high altitude.

Markus Tannheimer, R Lechner

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Initial Treatment of High-Altitude Pulmonary Edema: Comparison of Oxygen and Auto-PEEP.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Altitude and Quality of Life of Older People in Colombia: A Multilevel Study.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Markus TannheimerDivision of Sport and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Ulm, Leimgrubenweg 14, 89075, Ulm, Germany. markus.tannheimer@arcor.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7830-6470
R LechnerDepartment Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, German Armed Forces Hospital Ulm, Oberer Eselsberg 40, 89081, Ulm, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCompared to measurements at sea level, measurement of oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry (SpO KEY QUESTION: Does the visually determined SpO

methodsFour participants of an expedition (6013 m; Pakistan), familiar with pulse oximetry at altitude, wrote down the representative value of the measurement interval of 3 min (SpO

resultsThe spread of the single values within the measurement interval is high (in single cases up to 17%-points) in case of insufficient acclimatization. With increasing acclimatization, the measured values stabilize. SpO

conclusionsThe correct pulse oximetric determination of SpO

Indexed as

AltitudeAcclimatizationCorrelation of DataHumansMountaineeringOximetryOxygenPakistanReproducibility of ResultsOxygenAcclimatizationAMSHigh altitudeHigh altitude illnessOxygen saturationPulse oximetry

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.