Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30701397›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of biomedical engineering2019

A Bag of Wavelet Features for Snore Sound Classification.

Kun Qian, Maximilian Schmitt, Christoph Janott, Zixing Zhang, Clemens Heiser, Winfried Hohenhorst, Michael Herzog, Werner Hemmert, Björn Schuller

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kun QianMachine Intelligence & Signal Processing Group, MMK, Technische Universität München, Arcisstr. 21, 80333, Munich, Germany. andykun.qian@tum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1918-6453
Maximilian SchmittZD.B Chair of Embedded Intelligence for Health Care & Wellbeing, Universität Augsburg, Eichleitnerstr. 30, 86159, Augsburg, Germany.
Christoph JanottMunich School of Bioengineering, Technische Universität München, Boltzmannstr. 11, 85748, Garching, Germany.
Zixing ZhangGLAM - Group on Language, Audio & Music, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, 180 Queens' Gate, Huxley Bldg., London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Clemens HeiserDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaningerstr. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Winfried HohenhorstDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Alfried Krupp Krankenhaus, Alfried-Krupp-Str. 21, 45131, Essen, Germany.
Michael HerzogDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Carl-Thiem-Klinikum Cottbus, Thiemstr. 111, 03048, Cottbus, Germany.
Werner HemmertMunich School of Bioengineering, Technische Universität München, Boltzmannstr. 11, 85748, Garching, Germany.
Björn SchullerZD.B Chair of Embedded Intelligence for Health Care & Wellbeing, Universität Augsburg, Eichleitnerstr. 30, 86159, Augsburg, Germany.

Funding

European Union's Seventh Framework 338164
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Snore sound (SnS) classification can support a targeted surgical approach to sleep related breathing disorders. Using machine listening methods, we aim to find the location of obstruction and vibration within a subject's upper airway. Wavelet features have been demonstrated to be efficient in the recognition of SnSs in previous studies. In this work, we use a bag-of-audio-words approach to enhance the low-level wavelet features extracted from SnS data. A Naïve Bayes model was selected as the classifier based on its superiority in initial experiments. We use SnS data collected from 219 independent subjects under drug-induced sleep endoscopy performed at three medical centres. The unweighted average recall achieved by our proposed method is 69.4%, which significantly ([Formula: see text] one-tailed z-test) outperforms the official baseline (58.5%), and beats the winner (64.2%) of the INTERSPEECH COMPARE Challenge 2017 Snoring sub-challenge. In addition, the conventionally used features like formants, mel-scale frequency cepstral coefficients, subband energy ratios, spectral frequency features, and the features extracted by the OPENSMILE toolkit are compared with our proposed feature set. The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method in SnS classification.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDatabases, FactualSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedSnoringSoundAdultFemaleHumansMaleBag-of-audio-wordsDrug-induced sleep endoscopyObstructive sleep apneaSnore soundWavelets

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.