Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30701392›Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2019

The prognostic accuracy evaluation of SAPS 3, SOFA and APACHE II scores for mortality prediction in the surgical ICU: an external validation study and decision-making analysis.

Antônio Luis Eiras Falcão, Alexandre Guimarães de Almeida Barros, Angela Alcântara Magnani Bezerra, Natália Lopes Ferreira, Claudinéia Muterle Logato, Filipa Pais Silva, Ana Beatriz Francioso Oliveira do Monte, Rodrigo Marques Tonella, Luciana Castilho de Figueiredo, Rui Moreno and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Development and validation of a predictive model for in-hospital mortality from perioperative bacteremia in gastrointestinal surgery.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Antônio Luis Eiras FalcãoIntensive Care Unit, Discipline of Physiology and Surgical Metabology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas (Unicamp), Tessália Viera de Camargo St. 126, University Town Zeferino Vaz, Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-887, Brazil. aefalcao@gmail.com.
Alexandre Guimarães de Almeida BarrosIntensive Care Unit, Discipline of Physiology and Surgical Metabology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas (Unicamp), Tessália Viera de Camargo St. 126, University Town Zeferino Vaz, Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-887, Brazil.
Angela Alcântara Magnani BezerraIntensive Care Unit, Discipline of Physiology and Surgical Metabology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas (Unicamp), Tessália Viera de Camargo St. 126, University Town Zeferino Vaz, Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-887, Brazil.
Natália Lopes FerreiraIntensive Care Unit, Discipline of Physiology and Surgical Metabology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas (Unicamp), Tessália Viera de Camargo St. 126, University Town Zeferino Vaz, Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-887, Brazil.
Claudinéia Muterle LogatoIntensive Care Unit, Discipline of Physiology and Surgical Metabology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas (Unicamp), Tessália Viera de Camargo St. 126, University Town Zeferino Vaz, Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-887, Brazil.
Filipa Pais SilvaUnidade de Cuidados Intensivos Polivalente, Unidade de Cuidados Neurocríticos, Hospital de São José, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal.
Ana Beatriz Francioso Oliveira do MonteIntensive Care Unit, Discipline of Physiology and Surgical Metabology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas (Unicamp), Tessália Viera de Camargo St. 126, University Town Zeferino Vaz, Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-887, Brazil.
Rodrigo Marques TonellaIntensive Care Unit, Discipline of Physiology and Surgical Metabology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas (Unicamp), Tessália Viera de Camargo St. 126, University Town Zeferino Vaz, Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-887, Brazil.
Luciana Castilho de FigueiredoIntensive Care Unit, Discipline of Physiology and Surgical Metabology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas (Unicamp), Tessália Viera de Camargo St. 126, University Town Zeferino Vaz, Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-887, Brazil.
Rui MorenoUnidade de Cuidados Intensivos Polivalente, Unidade de Cuidados Neurocríticos, Hospital de São José, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal.
Desanka DragosavacIntensive Care Unit, Discipline of Physiology and Surgical Metabology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas (Unicamp), Tessália Viera de Camargo St. 126, University Town Zeferino Vaz, Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-887, Brazil.
Nelson Adami AndreolloIntensive Care Unit, Discipline of Physiology and Surgical Metabology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas (Unicamp), Tessália Viera de Camargo St. 126, University Town Zeferino Vaz, Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-887, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe early postoperative period is critical for surgical patients. SOFA, SAPS 3 and APACHE II are prognostic scores widely used to predict mortality in ICU patients. This study aimed to evaluate these index tests for their prognostic accuracy for intra-ICU and in-hospital mortalities as target conditions in patients admitted to ICU after urgent or elective surgeries and to test whether they aid in decision-making. The process comprised the assessment of discrimination through analysis of the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves and calibration of the prognostic models for the target conditions. After, the clinical relevance of applying them was evaluated through the measurement of the net benefit of their use in the clinical decision.

resultsIndex tests were found to discriminate regular for both target conditions with a poor calibration (C statistics-intra-ICU mortality AUROCs: APACHE II 0.808, SAPS 3 0.821 and SOFA 0.797/in-hospital mortality AUROCs: APACHE II 0.772, SAPS 3 0.790 and SOFA 0.742). Calibration assessment revealed a weak correlation between the observed and expected number of cases in several thresholds of risk, calculated by each model, for both tested outcomes. The net benefit analysis showed that all score's aggregate value in the clinical decision when the calculated probabilities of death ranged between 10 and 40%.

conclusionsIn this study, we observed that the tested ICU prognostic scores are fair tools for intra-ICU and in-hospital mortality prediction in a cohort of postoperative surgical patients. Also, they may have some potential to be used as ancillary data to support decision-making by physicians and families regarding the level of therapeutic investment and palliative care.

Indexed as

Critical carePrognostic scoresSurgical intensive care unit

Identifiers

PMID30701392
PMCPMC6353976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.