Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30701377›Full record

Trial reportJournal of gambling studies2019

Online Self-Directed Interventions for Gambling Disorder: Randomized Controlled Trial.

David C Hodgins, John A Cunningham, Robert Murray, Sylvia Hagopian

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of gambling studies, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04074681 (Efficacy of an Internet-based Psychological Intervention for Problem Gambling and Gambling Disorder), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04074681 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of an Internet-based Psychological Intervention for Problem Gambling and Gambling Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversitat Jaume IRan2023 to 2024Enrolled134ConditionsPathological GamblingArmsGambling Internet-based Protocol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Gambling disorder comorbidity a narrative review.Dialogues in clinical neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David C HodginsUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Canada. dhodgins@ucalgary.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2737-5200
John A CunninghamCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada.
Robert MurrayCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada.
Sylvia HagopianCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-directed treatments for gambling disorder have been developed to attract individuals who are reluctant to seek formal treatment. Self-directed treatments provide individuals with information and support to initiate a recovery program without attending formal treatment. In this study, an online version of a previously evaluated telephone-based intervention package is compared to a brief online normative feedback intervention called Check Your Gambling. In a randomized controlled trial design, participants with gambling problems who were not interested in formal treatment (N = 181) were recruited through media announcements. After a baseline telephone assessment, participants were assigned to have access to either the brief Check Your Gambling, or the extended self-management tools intervention. Follow-up assessments were conducted at 3, 6, and 12 months post baseline by blinded interviewers. Participant nominated collaterals were contacted to validate self-reported gambling involvement. The follow-up rate at 12 months was 78%. Participants in both conditions showed significant reductions in days of gambling and problem severity but no differences between conditions were found, contrary to the primary hypothesis. Lack of previous treatment for gambling and higher baseline self-efficacy predicted fewer days of gambling in both conditions. Self-efficacy increased over time but did not appear to mediate changes in gambling. Participants who were most engaged in the extended online program showed better outcomes. Those with low engagement showed a slower trajectory of change but equivalent improvements by 12 months. The extended online intervention was not associated with better outcomes than the brief Check Your Gambling intervention. Future research needs to explore the attractiveness, uptake, and effectiveness of online interventions with and without therapist support to understand their potential role in gambling disorder treatment systems.Trial Registration ISRCTN06220098.

Indexed as

InternetAdultAgedFemaleGamblingHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychotherapy, BriefSelf CareSelf EfficacyBrief interventionClinical trialGambling disorderNormative feedbackOnline intervention

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.