ArticleSurgical endoscopy2019
Long-term outcomes following endoscopic stenting in the management of leaks after foregut and bariatric surgery.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Endoscopic Treatment of Staple-Line Leaks After Sleeve Gastrectomy in Patients with Obesity: Which One is the Best Option, if Any? A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis and Meta-regression.Obesity surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Stent Management of Leaks After Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Obesity surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Endoscopic management of leaks and fistulas after bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Pooled it
- Management of Gastric Leaks After Bariatric Surgery: Proposed Endoscopic Treatment Algorithm Based on 10-Year Experience.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- Development and External Validation of a Machine Learning-Based Risk Score for Stent Outcomes in Post-Bariatric Leak Management: The "Alexandria-Bari-Stent" Tool.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- Revision Bariatric Procedures and Management of Complications from Bariatric Surgery.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2022Review
- Role of Primary Use of Mega Stents Alone and Combined with Other Endoscopic Procedures for Early Leak and Stenosis After Bariatric Surgery, Single-Institution Experience.Obesity surgery · 2021Article
- Outcome and Adverse Events of Endoscopic Bariatric Stents for Management of Leakage after Bariatric Surgery.Obesity surgery · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEndoscopic stenting has been shown to be effective in treating leaks after bariatric surgery. However, concerns remain regarding its long-term efficacy. The purpose of this study was to assess the evolution of endoscopic stenting and its efficacy over time, as well as the impact of stent fixation on migration rates and long-term outcomes. In addition, the effect of stenting on long-term weight loss and chronic reflux was also evaluated.
methodsA retrospective review was conducted including 37 patients from 2005 to 2017 who had undergone placement of stents after various bariatric procedures. Stents were placed endoscopically and, after 2012, secured with a figure-of-eight overstitch. Demographics, weight loss data, stent migration rates, incidence of revision surgery, chronic PPI use, and chronic symptoms of reflux data were obtained and analyzed.
resultsThirty-seven patients from 2005 to 2017 required endoscopic stenting for leaks. 43.24% patients underwent sleeve gastrectomy, 40.54% gastric bypass, 5.40% patients underwent duodenal switch, and 10.81% underwent miscellaneous foregut procedures. The overall success rate was 94.59% (35 of 37 patients). The incidence of stent migration before 2012 was 41.18% versus 15% after 2012 (p = 0.136271). There were 2 treatment failures, one treated successfully with re-stenting and another other requiring revision surgery. Overall, the percent of excess body weight lost was 57.21% over an average of 21 months. 58.82% of patients used PPI chronically; however 41.17% noted actual symptoms of reflux. 16.22% (6 of 37) patients ultimately underwent revision surgery.
conclusionEndoscopic stenting is a safe and effective treatment for leaks after bariatric surgery. While complications can include stent migration, newer stent technology and endoscopic overstitching techniques show promise in reducing the incidence of stent migration. Despite undergoing treatment with stenting, these patients had successful weight loss with relatively low rates of chronic PPI use and reflux symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30701363What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.