Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30701315›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2019

On the impact of cannabis consumption on traffic safety: a driving simulator study with habitual cannabis consumers.

Anne Tank, Tobias Tietz, Thomas Daldrup, Holger Schwender, Florence Hellen, Stefanie Ritz-Timme, Benno Hartung

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Association of driving with blood delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol: a systematic review.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Interpol review of toxicology 2019-2022.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2023
    Review
  6. Cannabis and driving ability.Current opinion in psychology · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anne TankInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Tobias TietzInstitute of Mathematics, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Thomas DaldrupInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Holger SchwenderInstitute of Mathematics, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Florence HellenDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LVR-Hospital Langenfeld, Langenfeld, Germany.
Stefanie Ritz-TimmeInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Benno HartungInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany. benno.hartung@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
Düsseldorf University Hospital · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEAsklepios Klinik Langen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To contribute to the ongoing discussion about threshold limits of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in road traffic, a driving simulator study with 15 habitually cannabis consuming test persons was conducted. Probands were tested on different routes after consumption of a maximum of three cannabis joints, each containing 300 μg THC/kg body weight (sober testing as well as testing directly, 3 and 6 h after cannabis consumption). Accompanying the drives, medical examinations including a blood sampling were performed. Driving faults and distinctive features in the medical examinations were allocated certain penalty points, which were then summed up and evaluated using the ANOVA model. The results showed that very high CIF values > 30 as well as serum THC concentrations > 15 ng/ml significantly increased the number of penalty points, but no direct correlation to the THC concentrations in serum and/or CIF values was detected. Instead, the point in time after cannabis consumption seems to play an important role concerning driving safety: significantly more driving faults were committed directly after consumption. Three hours after consumption, no significant increase of driving faults was seen. Six hours after consumption (during the so-called subacute phase), an increase of driving faults could be noted although not significant. Considering the limitation of our study (e.g. small test group, no placebo test persons, long lasting test situation with possible tiredness), further studies focusing on the time dependant impact of cannabis consumption on road traffic are required.

Indexed as

Automobile DrivingCannabisMarijuana SmokingAccidents, TrafficAdultAnalysis of VarianceComputer SimulationDronabinolFemaleHallucinogensHumansMalePsychomotor PerformanceYoung AdultDronabinolHallucinogensCannabisDriving simulatorImpairmentRoad trafficSafety to driveSubacute phaseTHC

Identifiers

PMID30701315
OpenAlexW2912183719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.