ReviewTranslational gastroenterology and hepatology2018
Endoscopic surveillance or ablation for Barrett's esophagus?
Review in Translational gastroenterology and hepatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is rising and the only known precursor of this disease is Barrett's esophagus (BE). EAC mortality remains high, prompting strategies to screen individuals with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms to identify BE and conduct surveillance in order to detect neoplasia at a stage that is amenable to cure. The effectiveness of endoscopic eradication therapy has been improving with reduced harms, yet it is unclear which patients will benefit from this procedure. This chapter reviews the evidence supporting surveillance for BE to reduce mortality from EAC and combines these results with economic analyses to identify the optimal means to manage patients with BE with high-grade dysplasia, low-grade dysplasia, or no dysplasia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.