ArticleCommunications biology2019
A visual illusion that influences perception and action through the dorsal pathway.
Article in Communications biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- The "What" and "How" of Pantomime Actions.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Virtual reality perceptual training can improve the temporal discrimination ability of swinging during softball batting.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2024Article
- Spatial contextual cues that help predict how a target will accelerate can be used to guide interception.Journal of vision · 2023Article
- The cost of aiming for the best answers: Inconsistent perception.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2023Review
- Grasping follows Weber's law: How to use response variability as a proxy for JND.Journal of vision · 2022Article
- Spatial distances affect temporal prediction and interception.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Tau and kappa in interception - how perceptual spatiotemporal interrelations affect movements.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2022Article
- Optimal integration of kinematic and ball-flight information when perceiving the speed of a moving ball.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2022Article
- Motion-in-depth effects on interceptive timing errors in an immersive environment.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Spatial coding for memory-guided reaching in visual and pictorial spaces.Journal of vision · 2020Article
- Overt and Covert Object Features Mediate Timing of Patterned Brain Activity during Motor Planning.Cerebral cortex communications · 2020Article
- A visual illusion that influences perception and action through the dorsal pathway.Communications biology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There are two main anatomically and physiologically defined visual pathways connecting the primary visual cortex with higher visual areas: the ventral and the dorsal pathway. The influential two-visual-systems hypothesis postulates that visual attributes are analyzed differently for different functions: in the dorsal pathway visual information is analyzed to guide actions, whereas in the ventral pathway visual information is analyzed for perceptual judgments. We here show that a person who cannot identify objects due to an extensive bilateral ventral brain lesion is able to judge the velocity at which an object moves. Moreover, both his velocity judgements and his interceptive actions are as susceptible to a motion illusion as those of people without brain lesions. These findings speak in favor of the idea that dorsal structures process information about attributes such as velocity, irrespective of whether such information is used for perceptual judgments or to guide actions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.