Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30701098›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2018

Cardiovascular adverse events in multiple myeloma patients.

Markus B Heckmann, Shirin Doroudgar, Hugo A Katus, Lorenz H Lehmann

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. [Cardiac arrhythmias in oncological diseases, during radiotherapy, chemotherapy].Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Markus B HeckmannDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology, and Pneumology, Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Shirin DoroudgarDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology, and Pneumology, Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Hugo A KatusDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology, and Pneumology, Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Lorenz H LehmannDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology, and Pneumology, Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
German Centre for Cardiovascular Research · DEHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple myeloma is a malignant disease, caused by an uncontrolled clonal proliferation of a specific group of white blood cells, the plasma cells. Clinical manifestations include bone pain due to osteolysis, hypercalcemia, anemia, and renal insufficiency. Proteasome inhibitors have substantially improved survival of patients suffering from multiple myeloma, providing an efficient treatment option mainly for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Although constituting one substance class, bortezomib, carfilzomib, and ixazomib differ greatly regarding their non-hematologic side effects. This article reviews the clinical and preclinical data on approved proteasome inhibitors in an attempt to decipher the underlying pathomechanisms related to cardiovascular adverse events seen in clinical trials.

Indexed as

bortezomibcardio-oncologycardiotoxicitycarfilzomibixazomibMultiple myelomaproteasome inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID30701098
PMCPMC6328391
OpenAlexW2896252370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.