Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30701071›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2019

Using local clinical and microbiological data to develop an institution specific carbapenem-sparing strategy in sepsis: a nested case-control study.

Merel M C Lambregts, Bart J C Hendriks, Leo G Visser, Sandra T Bernards, Mark G J de Boer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Merel M C Lambregts1Department of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3637-9115
Bart J C Hendriks2Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leo G Visser1Department of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Sandra T Bernards3Department of Medical Microbiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Mark G J de Boer1Department of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: From a stewardship perspective it is recommended that antibiotic guidelines are adjusted to the local setting, accounting for the local epidemiology of pathogens. In many settings the prevalence of Gram-negative pathogens with resistance to empiric sepsis therapy is increasing. How and when to escalate standard sepsis therapy to a reserve antimicrobial agent, is a recurrent dilemma. The study objective was to develop decision strategies for empiric sepsis therapy based on local microbiological and clinical data, and estimate the number needed to treat with a carbapenem to avoid mismatch of empiric therapy in one patient (NNTC). Methods: We performed a nested case control study in patients (> 18 years) with Gram-negative bacteremia in 2013-2016. Cases were defined as patients with Gram-negative bacteremia with in vitro resistance to the combination 2nd generation cephalosporin AND aminoglycoside (C-2GC + AG). Control patients had Gram-negative bacteremia with in vitro susceptibility to cefuroxime AND/OR gentamicin, 1:2 ratio. Univariate and multivariable analysis was performed for demographic and clinical predictors of resistance. The adequacy rates of empiric therapy and the NNTC were estimated for different strategies. Results: The cohort consisted of 486 episodes of Gram-negative bacteremia in 450 patients. Median age was 66 years (IQR 56-74). In vitro resistance to C-2GC + AG was present in 44 patients (8.8%). Independent predictors for resistance to empiric sepsis therapy were hematologic malignancy (adjusted OR 4.09, 95%CI 1.43-11.62, Conclusions: A risk-based approach in empiric sepsis therapy has the potential to better target the use of reserve antimicrobial agents aimed at multi-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. A structured evaluation of the expected antimicrobial consumption and antibiotic adequacy rates is essential to be able to weigh the costs and benefits of potential antibiotic strategies and select the most appropriate approach.

Indexed as

AgedAminoglycosidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaCarbapenemsCase-Control StudiesCephalosporinsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedSepsisAminoglycosidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarbapenemsCephalosporinsAntibiotic stewardshipAntimicrobial resistanceEmpiric therapyGram-negative bacteremiaGuideline-developmentSepsis

Identifiers

PMID30701071
PMCPMC6347774
OpenAlexW2914275292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.