Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30700867›Full record

ArticleNature microbiology2019

Author Correction: DSYB catalyses the key step of dimethylsulfoniopropionate biosynthesis in many phytoplankton.

Andrew R J Curson, Beth T Williams, Benjamin J Pinchbeck, Leanne P Sims, Ana Bermejo Martínez, Peter Paolo L Rivera, Deepak Kumaresan, Elena Mercadé, Lewis G Spurgin, Ornella Carrión and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readPublished Erratum
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Andrew R J CursonSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Beth T WilliamsSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Benjamin J PinchbeckSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Leanne P SimsSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Ana Bermejo MartínezSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Peter Paolo L RiveraSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Deepak KumaresanSchool of Biological Sciences and Institute for Global Food Security, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Elena MercadéLaboratory of Microbiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7828-2210
Lewis G SpurginSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Ornella CarriónSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Simon MoxonSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Rose Ann CattolicoDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Unnikrishnan KuzhiumparambilClimate Change Cluster (C3), Faculty of Science, University of Technology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Paul GuagliardoThe Centre for Microscopy Characterisation and Analysis, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia.
Peta L ClodeThe Centre for Microscopy Characterisation and Analysis, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5188-4737
Jean-Baptiste RainaClimate Change Cluster (C3), Faculty of Science, University of Technology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Jonathan D ToddSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK. jonathan.todd@uea.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0777-9312
University of East Anglia · GBThe University of Western Australia · AUUniversity of Technology Sydney · AUQueen's University Belfast · GBUniversitat de Barcelona · ESUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the version of this Letter originally published, the Methods incorrectly stated that all phytoplankton cultures were sampled in mid-exponential phase. The low-nitrogen cultures were sampled in early stationary phase and at the point at which Fv/Fm values decreased, to indicate that cultures were experiencing low-nitrogen conditions. All other phytoplankton cultures were sampled in exponential phase. Growth and Fv/Fm data are provided here on high- and low-nitrogen cultures (Figs 1, 2 and 3) to clarify and support this correction. The Methods also stated that cell counting was done using a Beckman Multisizer 3 Coulter Counter, but a CASY Model TT Cell Counter was used.

Identifiers

PMID30700867
OpenAlexW2913681113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.