ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2019
The Role of Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Tubular Carcinoma of the Breast: A Population Database Study.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Relationship Between Clinicopathological Features and Prognosis of 22 Cases of Tubular Breast Carcinoma.The breast journal · 2025Article
- Pure tubular carcinoma of the breast: a case series.Journal of medical case reports · 2023Review
- Clinical Relevance of Tubular Breast Carcinoma: Large Retrospective Study and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Pure and Mixed Tubular Carcinoma of the Breast: Mammographic Features, Clinicopathological Characteristics and Prognostic Analysis.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
- Tubular Carcinoma of the Breast: The Possibility to Omit Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy.Cancer diagnosis & prognosisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to investigate the role of axillary lymph node dissection on the outcome of patients with tubular carcinoma of the breast. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients diagnosed with tubular carcinoma of the breast between 2000-2013 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Statistical analysis of the data was undertaken, including analysis of breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). RESULTS Of the 5,645 patients identified on the SEER database with tubular carcinoma of the breast, 5,032 (89.4%) patients had undergone axillary lymph node dissection, with significantly increased rates after 2002 compared with rates between 2000-2001 (p <0.001), which stabilized between 2002-2013 (p=0.330). Axillary lymph node metastases were present in 6.1% of all patients and in 5.3% of patients with a tumor size ≤2 cm. Lymph node-positive disease was associated with patient age ≤65 years, intermediate-grade or high-grade tumors, and tumor size >2.0 cm. Axillary lymph node dissection was an independent prognostic indicator. The 10-year BCSS was 97.3% and 96.6% in patients with and without axillary lymph node dissection, respectively (p=0.002). The number of removed lymph nodes was not related to breast cancer-specific survival. CONCLUSIONS In patients with tubular carcinoma of the breast, lymph node status was not associated with significant breast cancer-specific survival. However, axillary lymph node dissection may still be considered for patients with for tubular carcinoma of the breast even in patients with a small tumor size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.