Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30700578›Full record

ArticleRNA (New York, N.Y.)2019

Expanded CUG repeats in

Remco T P van Cruchten, Bé Wieringa, Derick G Wansink

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RNA (New York, N.Y.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The role of untranslated region variants in Mendelian disease: a review.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Abnormal phase separation of biomacromolecules in human diseases.Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Overlapping mechanisms of lncRNA and expanded microsatellite RNA.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Lost in Translation: When the Rules Do Not Apply.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA
    Review
  16. Repeat-associated RNA structure and aberrant splicing.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Gene regulatory mechanisms
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Remco T P van CruchtenDepartment of Cell Biology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, 6525 GA, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2918-1488
Bé WieringaDepartment of Cell Biology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, 6525 GA, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9192-8020
Derick G WansinkDepartment of Cell Biology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, 6525 GA, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6773-8662
Radboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is a complex neuromuscular disorder caused by expansion of a CTG repeat in the 3'-untranslated region (UTR) of the

Indexed as

3' Untranslated RegionsInverted Repeat SequencesTrinucleotide RepeatsBase PairingGene ExpressionHumansModels, GeneticMyotonic DystrophyMyotonin-Protein KinaseNucleic Acid ConformationOligonucleotidesOligonucleotides, AntisenseRecombinant Proteins3' Untranslated RegionsDMPK protein, humanlocked nucleic acidMyotonin-Protein KinaseOligonucleotidesOligonucleotides, AntisenseRecombinant Proteinsantisense oligonucleotideDMPKhairpinmyotonic dystrophyRNA foldingtrinucleotide repeat

Identifiers

PMID30700578
PMCPMC6426290
OpenAlexW2914856652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.