Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30700532›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2019

Subthalamic Nucleus and Sensorimotor Cortex Activity During Speech Production.

Anna Chrabaszcz, Wolf-Julian Neumann, Otilia Stretcu, Witold J Lipski, Alan Bush, Christina A Dastolfo-Hromack, Dengyu Wang, Donald J Crammond, Susan Shaiman, Michael W Dickey and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Subthalamic nucleus-language network connectivity predicts dopaminergic modulation of speech function in Parkinson's disease.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Anna ChrabaszczDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213.ORCID 0000-0002-1766-7245
Wolf-Julian NeumannMovement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Campus Mitte, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany 10117.ORCID 0000-0002-6758-9708
Otilia StretcuMachine Learning Department, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213.
Witold J LipskiBrain Modulation Laboratory, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213.
Alan BushBrain Modulation Laboratory, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213.ORCID 0000-0002-0407-5750
Christina A Dastolfo-HromackBrain Modulation Laboratory, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213.
Dengyu WangBrain Modulation Laboratory, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213.
Donald J CrammondBrain Modulation Laboratory, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213.
Susan ShaimanDepartment of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213.ORCID 0000-0002-2452-2095
Michael W DickeyDepartment of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213.ORCID 0000-0002-9068-3313
Lori L HoltDepartment of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213.ORCID 0000-0002-8732-4977
Robert S TurnerDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, and.ORCID 0000-0002-6074-4365
Julie A FiezDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213.ORCID 0000-0003-1090-2481
R Mark RichardsonBrain Modulation Laboratory, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, richardsonrm@upmc.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2620-7387
University of Pittsburgh · USCarnegie Mellon University · USCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · AR

Funding

Subthalamic and corticosubthalamic coding of speech productionU01NS098969 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI RICHARDSON, ROBERT MARK · 2016 to 2018
$3.3M
Functions of the Motor Cortical-Thalamic CircuitR01NS091853 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI TURNER, ROBERT STERLING · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS091853NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS098969
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sensorimotor cortex is somatotopically organized to represent the vocal tract articulators such as lips, tongue, larynx, and jaw. How speech and articulatory features are encoded at the subcortical level, however, remains largely unknown. We analyzed LFP recordings from the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and simultaneous electrocorticography recordings from the sensorimotor cortex of 11 human subjects (1 female) with Parkinson's disease during implantation of deep-brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes while they read aloud three-phoneme words. The initial phonemes involved either articulation primarily with the tongue (coronal consonants) or the lips (labial consonants). We observed significant increases in high-gamma (60-150 Hz) power in both the STN and the sensorimotor cortex that began before speech onset and persisted for the duration of speech articulation. As expected from previous reports, in the sensorimotor cortex, the primary articulators involved in the production of the initial consonants were topographically represented by high-gamma activity. We found that STN high-gamma activity also demonstrated specificity for the primary articulator, although no clear topography was observed. In general, subthalamic high-gamma activity varied along the ventral-dorsal trajectory of the electrodes, with greater high-gamma power recorded in the dorsal locations of the STN. Interestingly, the majority of significant articulator-discriminative activity in the STN occurred before that in sensorimotor cortex. These results demonstrate that articulator-specific speech information is contained within high-gamma activity of the STN, but with different spatial and temporal organization compared with similar information encoded in the sensorimotor cortex.

Indexed as

AgedBrain MappingElectrocorticographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhotic StimulationSensorimotor CortexSpeechSubthalamic Nucleusdeep brain stimulationelectrocorticographyParkinson's diseasesensorimotor cortexspeechsubthalamic nucleus

Identifiers

PMID30700532
PMCPMC6445998
OpenAlexW2899116337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.