Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30700485›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Nordic Innovative Trials to Evaluate osteoPorotic Fractures (NITEP) Collaboration: The Nordic DeltaCon Trial protocol-non-operative treatment versus reversed total shoulder arthroplasty in patients 65 years of age and older with a displaced proximal humerus fracture: a prospective, randomised controlled trial.

Antti P Launonen, Tore Fjalestad, Minna K Laitinen, Tuomas Lähdeoja, Carl Ekholm, Tone Wagle, Ville M Mattila, NITEP-group

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03531463 (Nordic DeltaCon Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03531463 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Nordic DeltaCon Trial: Non-operative Treatment Versus Reversed Total Shoulder Prosthesis in Patients Sixty Five Years of Age and Older With Displaced 3- and 4 Parts Proximal Humeral Fractures - a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorOslo University HospitalRan2018 to 2028Enrolled154ConditionsProximal Humeral FractureArmsOperative treatment with Reversed Total Shoulder Prosthesis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Nonoperative treatment of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Antti P LaunonenTampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Tore FjalestadOslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Minna K LaitinenTampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Tuomas LähdeojaHelsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Carl EkholmSahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden.
Tone WagleOslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Ville M MattilaTampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
NITEP-group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe proximal humerus fracture (PHF) is one of the most common fractures in the elderly. The majority of PHFs are treated non-operatively, while 15%-33% of patients undergo surgical treatment. Recent randomised controlled trial (RCT) and meta-analyses have shown that there is no difference in outcome between non-operative treatment and locking plate or hemi-arthroplasty. During the past decade, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has gained popularity in the treatment of PHF, although there is a lack of RCTs comparing RTSA to non-operative treatment.

methodsThis is a prospective, single-blinded, randomised, controlled, multicentre and multinational trial comparing RTSA with non-operative treatment in displaced proximal humeral fractures in patients 65-85 years. The primary outcome in this study is QuickDASH-score measured at 2 years. Secondary outcomes include visual analogue scale for pain, grip strength, Oxford shoulder score, Constant score and the number of reoperations and complications.The hypothesis of the trial is that operative treatment with RTSA produces better outcome after 2 and 5 years measured with QuickDASH. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: In this protocol, we describe the design, method and management of the Nordic DeltaCon trial. The ethical approval for the trial has been given by the Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics, Norway. There have been several examples in orthopaedics of innovations that result in failure after medium-term follow-ups . In order to prevent such failures and to increase our knowledge of RSTA, we feel a large-scale study of the effects of the surgery on the outcome that focuses on the complications and reoperations is warranted. After the trial 2-year follow-up, the results will be disseminated in a major orthopaedic publication. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03531463; Pre-Results.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, ShoulderFracture Fixation, InternalAgedAged, 80 and overBone PlatesFinlandHumansLinear ModelsMulticenter Studies as TopicNorwayOsteoporotic FracturesPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecovery of Functionadult orthopaedicsmusculoskeletal disordersshouldertrauma management

Identifiers

PMID30700485
PMCPMC6352806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.