Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30700481›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Alternative service models for delivery of healthcare services in high-income countries: a scoping review of systematic reviews.

Rebecca L Jessup, Denise A O'Connor, Polina Putrik, Kobi Rischin, Janet Nezon, Sheila Cyril, Sasha Shepperd, Rachelle Buchbinder

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rebecca L Jessup *Monash Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Institute, Monash University, Malvern, Victoria, Australia.
Denise A O'Connor *Monash Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Institute, Monash University, Malvern, Victoria, Australia.
Polina PutrikMonash Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Institute, Monash University, Malvern, Victoria, Australia.
Kobi RischinMonash Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Institute, Monash University, Malvern, Victoria, Australia.
Janet NezonDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Sheila CyrilMonash Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Institute, Monash University, Malvern, Victoria, Australia.
Sasha ShepperdNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Rachelle BuchbinderMonash Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Institute, Monash University, Malvern, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

Department of Health 12/209/66
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCosts associated with the delivery of healthcare services are growing at an unsustainable rate. There is a need for health systems and healthcare providers to consider the economic impacts of the service models they deliver and to determine if alternative models may lead to improved efficiencies without compromising quality of care. The aim of this protocol is to describe a scoping review of the extent, range and nature of available synthesised research on alternative delivery arrangements for health systems relevant to high-income countries published in the last 5 years.

designWe will perform a scoping review of systematic reviews of trials and economic studies of alternative delivery arrangements for health systems relevant to high-income countries published on 'Pretty Darn Quick' (PDQ)-Evidence between 1 January 2012 and 20 September 2017. All English language systematic reviews will be included. The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care taxonomy of health system interventions will be used to categorise delivery arrangements according to: how and when care is delivered, where care is provided and changes to the healthcare environment, who provides care and how the healthcare workforce is managed, co-ordination of care and management of care processes and information and communication technology systems. This work is part of a 5-year Partnership Centre for Health System Sustainability aiming to investigate and create interventions to improve health-system-performance sustainability. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No primary data will be collected, so ethical approval is not required. The study findings will be published and presented at relevant conferences.

Indexed as

Developed CountriesHealth Care CostsDelivery of Health CareHumansSystematic Reviews as Topicalternative healthcare modelsdelivery arrangementhealthcare deliveryhigh-incomescoping reviewsustainability

Identifiers

PMID30700481
PMCPMC6352783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.