Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30700327›Full record

ArticleJournal of ovarian research2019

Comparison and analysis of the clinicopathological features of SCEO and ECOM.

Ting Wang, Xiaodan Zhang, Zhiying Lu, Junyan Wang, Keqin Hua

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ovarian research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Elevated CA-125 Level and ER-Negative as Prognostic Factors for Ovarian Metastasis in Patients with Endometrial Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ting WangDepartment of Gynecology, obstetrics and gynecology hospital, Fudan university, Shanghai, 200,090, China.
Xiaodan ZhangDepartment of Gynecology, obstetrics and gynecology hospital, Fudan university, Shanghai, 200,090, China.
Zhiying LuDepartment of Gynecology, obstetrics and gynecology hospital, Fudan university, Shanghai, 200,090, China.
Junyan WangDepartment of Gynecology, obstetrics and gynecology hospital, Fudan university, Shanghai, 200,090, China.
Keqin HuaDepartment of Gynecology, obstetrics and gynecology hospital, Fudan university, Shanghai, 200,090, China. huakeqinjiaoshou@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of our study was to evaluate and compare the differences in the clinicopathological variables and overall survival (OS) of synchronous primary cancers of the endometrium and ovary (SCEO) and endometrial cancer with ovarian metastasis (ECOM). In addition, we aimed to determine the characteristics of and effective treatments for patients with SCEO to avoid misdiagnosis and overtreatment. MATERIALS AND

methodsA review of medical records from January 2009 to January 2017 revealed 111 patients with coexisting ovarian and endometrial carcinoma diagnosed at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University. Clinicopathological variables were analysed using the Chi square test and Student's t test. The survival rate was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and statistical significance was analysed using the logarithmic rank test (univariate analysis).

resultsThere were 51 cases of SCEO and 60 cases of ECOM. The mean age at diagnosis was 53.96 years and 55.41 years, respectively. There were no differences in age, menopausal status, BMI, CA125 level or complaints between the two groups. The 5-year survival rates were 58.8 and 36.7%, respectively (P < 0.001). Significant differences were found in the endometrial tumour classification, ovarian cancer stage, and lymph node and omentum metastasis between SCEO and ECOM.

conclusionsThe differences found between SCEO and ECOM are of great clinical significance. Our results reveal useful prognostic and clinicopathological features. More aggressive therapies should be administered to both SCEO and ECOM patients, especially elderly patients and those with menopause, endometrial tumours, advanced omentum metastasis, and lymph node dissection.

Indexed as

Endometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedNeoplasms, Multiple PrimaryNeoplasm StagingOmentumOvarian NeoplasmsPeritoneal NeoplasmsPrognosisEndometrial cancer with ovarian metastasis (ECOM)Endometrial carcinomaOvarian cancerSynchronous primary cancer of the endometrium and ovary (SCEO)

Identifiers

PMID30700327
PMCPMC6352368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.