Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30700298›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering online2019

Finite state machine implementation for left ventricle modeling and control.

Jacob M King, Clint A Bergeron, Charles E Taylor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jacob M KingDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, 241 E. Lewis St. RM320, Lafayette, LA, 70503, USA.
Clint A BergeronDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, 241 E. Lewis St. RM320, Lafayette, LA, 70503, USA.
Charles E TaylorDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, 241 E. Lewis St. RM320, Lafayette, LA, 70503, USA. c.taylor@louisiana.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3408-2994

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSimulation of a left ventricle has become a critical facet of evaluating therapies and operations that interact with cardiac performance. The ability to simulate a wide range of possible conditions, changes in cardiac performance, and production of nuisances at transition points enables evaluation of precision medicine concepts that are designed to function through this spectrum. Ventricle models have historically been based on biomechanical analysis, with model architectures constituted of continuous states and not conducive to deterministic processing. Producing a finite-state machine governance of a left ventricle model would enable a broad range of applications: physiological controller development, experimental left ventricle control, and high throughput simulations of left ventricle function.

methodsA method for simulating left ventricular pressure-volume control utilizing a preload, afterload, and contractility sensitive computational model is shown. This approach uses a logic-based conditional finite state machine based on the four pressure-volume phases that describe left ventricular function. This was executed with a physical system hydraulic model using MathWorks' Simulink

resultsThe approach developed is capable of simulating changes in preload, afterload, and contractility in time based on a patient's preload analysis. Six pressure-volume loop simulations are presented to include a base-line, preload change only, afterload change only, contractility change only, a clinical control, and heart failure with normal ejection fraction. All simulations produced an error of less than 1 mmHg and 1 mL of the absolute difference between the desired and simulated pressure and volume set points. The acceptable performance of the fixed-timestep architecture in the finite state machine allows for deployment to deterministic systems, such as experimental systems for validation.

conclusionsThe proposed approach allows for personalized data, revealed through an individualized clinical pressure-volume analysis, to be simulated in silico. The computational model architecture enables this control structure to be executed on deterministic systems that govern experimental left ventricles. This provides a mock circulatory system with the ability to investigate the pathophysiology for a specific individual by replicating the exact pressure-volume relationship defined by their left ventricular functionality; as well as perform predictive analysis regarding changes in preload, afterload, and contractility in time.

Indexed as

Models, CardiovascularVentricular Function, LeftAlgorithmsBlood PressureCardiovascular DiseasesComputer SimulationFinite Element AnalysisHeartHeart VentriclesHemodynamicsHumansMachine LearningMyocardial ContractionStroke VolumeCardiovascular lumped parameter modelingLeft ventricular pressure–volume relationshipMock circulatory systemPatient-specific and population modelingPV loopSimulating cardiovascular hemodynamics

Identifiers

PMID30700298
PMCPMC6354391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.