Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30700256›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2019

Epidural analgesia and its implications in the maternal health in a low parity comunity.

Ivan Penuela, Pilar Isasi-Nebreda, Hedylamar Almeida, Mario López, Esther Gomez-Sanchez, Eduardo Tamayo

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ivan PenuelaUnit of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and Pain Treatment, University Hospital Joan XXIII, Carrer Dr. Mallafré Guasch, 4, Tarragona, Spain. ivanpenuelasaldana@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8722-9489
Pilar Isasi-NebredaUnit of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and Pain Treatment, University Hospital of Burgos, Burgos, Spain.
Hedylamar AlmeidaUnit of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and Pain Treatment, University Hospital of Burgos, Burgos, Spain.
Mario LópezUnit of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and Pain Treatment, Clinic University Hospital, Valladolid, Spain.
Esther Gomez-SanchezUnit of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and Pain Treatment, Clinic University Hospital, Valladolid, Spain.
Eduardo TamayoUnit of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and Pain Treatment, Clinic University Hospital, Valladolid, Spain.
Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid · ESHospital Universitari Joan XXIII de Tarragona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn regard to obstetrical analgesia management there are different results related to the use of epidural analgesia versus mechanical adverse outcomes at delivery.

methodsCohort study of 23,183 consecutive, term, singleton vaginal deliveries, including spontaneous and induced labours, at a single institution from January 2004 to June 2016 to determine the association between epidural analgesia and different mechanical complications affecting maternal health such as severe perineal tears (SPT), abnormal foetal head position at delivery, instrumental delivery and caesarean section (CS). Multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to evaluate the risk factors of these mechanical complications with respect to possible cofounders.

resultsEpidural analgesia was used in 15,821 (68.24%) women. The logistic regression model showed a non-significant association between the use of epidural analgesia and SPT (odds ratio [OR], 078; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48-1.26; p = 0.310). Instrumental delivery and CSs were more frequently performed in cases than controls (p = < 0.001), with OR of 1.19 (95% CI: 1.10-1.29) for CS and with OR of 3.27 (95% CI: 2.93-4.61) for instrumental delivery. The abnormal foetal position head at delivery were significantly lower in the neonates delivered without epidural analgesia compared with those in which epidural analgesia was used (p < 0.001) with OR of 1.43 (95% CI:1.27-1.72).

conclusionsEpidural analgesia is not associated with an increase of SPT, but it was an independent risk factor for instrumental delivery, CS and abnormal foetal head position at delivery.

Indexed as

AdultAnalgesia, EpiduralAnalgesia, ObstetricalDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansLabor PresentationLacerationsLogistic ModelsMultivariate AnalysisObstetric Labor ComplicationsOdds RatioParityPerineumPregnancyRetrospective StudiesCaesarean sectionDeliveryEpidural analgesiaLaborMaternal outcomesPerineal tears

Identifiers

PMID30700256
PMCPMC6354357
OpenAlexW2912510436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.