Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30700167›Full record

ReviewExpert review of vaccines2019

The role of systems biology approaches in determining molecular signatures for the development of more effective vaccines.

Abdulmohammad Pezeshki, Inna G Ovsyannikova, Brett A McKinney, Gregory A Poland, Richard B Kennedy

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert review of vaccines, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Systems Biology Approaches for Therapeutics Development Against COVID-19.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Review
  12. Maternal Immunization: Nature Meets Nurture.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Editorial: Molecular Vaccines Against Pathogens in the Post-genomic Era.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Abdulmohammad Pezeshkia Mayo Vaccine Research Group , Mayo Clinic , Rochester , MN , USA.
Inna G Ovsyannikovaa Mayo Vaccine Research Group , Mayo Clinic , Rochester , MN , USA.
Brett A McKinneyb Department of Mathematics , University of Tulsa , Tulsa , OK , USA.
Gregory A Polanda Mayo Vaccine Research Group , Mayo Clinic , Rochester , MN , USA.
Richard B Kennedya Mayo Vaccine Research Group , Mayo Clinic , Rochester , MN , USA.
Mayo Clinic in Florida · USUniversity of Tulsa · US

Funding

Bioinformatics Approach to Influenza A/H1N1 Vaccine Immune ProfilingU01AI089859 · NIAID · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI POLAND, GREGORY A. · 2010 to 2015
$33.8M
The Immunogenetics of Measles ImmunityR01AI033144 · NIAID · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI POLAND, GREGORY A. · 1993 to 2022
$8.1M
Immunogenetic Mechanisms of Vaccine ResponseR37AI048793 · NIAID · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI POLAND, GREGORY A. · 2011 to 2020
$5.4M
Systems Biology of Mumps Vaccine ResponseR01AI138965 · NIAID · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KENNEDY, RICHARD B · 2018 to 2022
$3.9M
Transcriptomic Signatures of Influenza Vaccine ResponsesR01AI132348 · NIAID · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KENNEDY, RICHARD B, POLAND, GREGORY A. · 2018 to 2022
$3.9M
Understanding measles vaccine failure (and success) in Southern IndiaR01AI121054 · NIAID · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI JACOB, JOSHY, KENNEDY, RICHARD B · 2017 to 2021
$3.8M
Genetic Markers of Long-Term Mumps Vaccine ImmunityR01AI127365 · NIAID · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KENNEDY, RICHARD B · 2016 to 2020
$3.6M
NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI040065NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI033144NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI121054NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI127365NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI132348NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI138965NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI048793NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI089859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEmerging infectious diseases are a major threat to public health, and while vaccines have proven to be one of the most effective preventive measures for infectious diseases, we still do not have safe and effective vaccines against many human pathogens, and emerging diseases continually pose new threats. The purpose of this review is to discuss how the creation of vaccines for these new threats has been hindered by limitations in the current approach to vaccine development. Recent advances in high-throughput technologies have enabled scientists to apply systems biology approaches to collect and integrate increasingly large datasets that capture comprehensive biological changes induced by vaccines, and then decipher the complex immune response to those vaccines. AREAS COVERED: This review covers advances in these technologies and recent publications that describe systems biology approaches to understanding vaccine immune responses and to understanding the rational design of new vaccine candidates. EXPERT OPINION: Systems biology approaches to vaccine development provide novel information regarding both the immune response and the underlying mechanisms and can inform vaccine development.

Indexed as

AnimalsCommunicable Diseases, EmergingDrug DevelopmentHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansPublic HealthSystems BiologyVaccinesVaccinesgene expression profilinggenomicsimmunologyproteomicsSystems biologyvaccinationvaccine developmentvaccinesviral vaccines

Identifiers

PMID30700167
PMCPMC6613212
OpenAlexW2912811299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.