Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30700044›Full record

ReviewGenes2019

Control of Eukaryotic DNA Replication Initiation-Mechanisms to Ensure Smooth Transitions.

Karl-Uwe Reusswig, Boris Pfander

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. CDC7 and APC/CNature communications · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. APC/C prevents a noncanonical order of cyclin/CDK activity to maintain CDK4/6 inhibitor-induced arrest.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. The Crk4-Cyc4 complex regulates GThe EMBO journal · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Mechanisms of eukaryotic replisome disassembly.Biochemical Society transactions · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Karl-Uwe ReusswigMax Planck Institute of Biochemistry, DNA Replication and Genome Integrity, 82152 Martinsried, Germany. kureusswig@biochem.mpg.de.ORCID 0000-0003-2544-4145
Boris PfanderMax Planck Institute of Biochemistry, DNA Replication and Genome Integrity, 82152 Martinsried, Germany. bpfander@biochem.mpg.de.ORCID 0000-0003-2180-5054

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA replication differs from most other processes in biology in that any error will irreversibly change the nature of the cellular progeny. DNA replication initiation, therefore, is exquisitely controlled. Deregulation of this control can result in over-replication characterized by repeated initiation events at the same replication origin. Over-replication induces DNA damage and causes genomic instability. The principal mechanism counteracting over-replication in eukaryotes is a division of replication initiation into two steps-licensing and firing-which are temporally separated and occur at distinct cell cycle phases. Here, we review this temporal replication control with a specific focus on mechanisms ensuring the faultless transition between licensing and firing phases.

Indexed as

Cell Cycle CheckpointsDNA Replication TimingAnimalsCell Cycle ProteinsHumansYeastsCell Cycle Proteinscell cyclecell cycle transitionsDNA replicationDNA replication initiationpost-translational protein modificationprotein degradation

Identifiers

PMID30700044
PMCPMC6409694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.