Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30699964›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Designing Paper-Based Immunoassays for Biomedical Applications.

Delyan R Hristov, Cristina Rodriguez-Quijada, Jose Gomez-Marquez, Kimberly Hamad-Schifferli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Applications of Gold Nanoparticles in Plasmonic and Nanophotonic Biosensing.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Rapid Colorimetric Detection of Wound Infection with a Fluidic Paper Device.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Delyan R HristovDepartment of Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA 02125, USA. Delyan.Hristov@umb.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1010-7966
Cristina Rodriguez-QuijadaDepartment of Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA 02125, USA. Cristina.Rodrigue002@umb.edu.
Jose Gomez-MarquezLittle Devices Lab, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. jfgm@mit.edu.
Kimberly Hamad-SchifferliDepartment of Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA 02125, USA. kim.hamad@umb.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4839-3179

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paper-based sensors and assays have been highly attractive for numerous biological applications, including rapid diagnostics and assays for disease detection, food safety, and clinical care. In particular, the paper immunoassay has helped drive many applications in global health due to its low cost and simplicity of operation. This review is aimed at examining the fundamentals of the technology, as well as different implementations of paper-based assays and discuss novel strategies for improving their sensitivity, performance, or enabling new capabilities. These innovations can be categorized into using unique nanoparticle materials and structures for detection via different techniques, novel biological species for recognizing biomarkers, or innovative device design and/or architecture.

Indexed as

PaperBiomarkersBiosensing TechniquesHumansImmunoassayNanoparticlesBiomarkersbiological sensorsdipstick assaylateral flow assaypaper-based immunoassaysrapid diagnostics

Identifiers

PMID30699964
PMCPMC6387326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.