Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30699950›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Deploying Acoustic Detection Algorithms on Low-Cost, Open-Source Acoustic Sensors for Environmental Monitoring.

Peter Prince, Andrew Hill, Evelyn Piña Covarrubias, Patrick Doncaster, Jake L Snaddon, Alex Rogers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Peter PrinceSchool of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK. pcp1g11@soton.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4857-261X
Andrew HillSchool of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK. ah1u14@soton.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7240-3659
Evelyn Piña CovarrubiasSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK. e.pinacovarrubias@soton.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3564-7467
Patrick DoncasterSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK. cpd@soton.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-9406-0693
Jake L SnaddonSchool of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK. j.l.snaddon@soton.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-3549-5472
Alex RogersDepartment of Computer Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, UK. alex.rogers@cs.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6324-0536

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council 1658469Natural Environmental Research Council NE/L002531/1Rufford Foundation 17047-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conservation researchers require low-cost access to acoustic monitoring technology. However, affordable tools are often constrained to short-term studies due to high energy consumption and limited storage. To enable long-term monitoring, energy and space efficiency must be improved on such tools. This paper describes the development and deployment of three acoustic detection algorithms that reduce the power and storage requirements of acoustic monitoring on affordable, open-source hardware. The algorithms aim to detect bat echolocation, to search for evidence of an endangered cicada species, and also to collect evidence of poaching in a protected nature reserve. The algorithms are designed to run on AudioMoth: a low-cost, open-source acoustic monitoring device, developed by the authors and widely adopted by the conservation community. Each algorithm addresses a detection task of increasing complexity, implementing extra analytical steps to account for environmental conditions such as wind, analysing samples multiple times to prevent missed events, and incorporating a hidden Markov model for sample classification in both the time and frequency domain. For each algorithm, we report on real-world deployments carried out with partner organisations and also benchmark the hidden Markov model against a convolutional neural network, a deep-learning technique commonly used for acoustics. The deployments demonstrate how acoustic detection algorithms extend the use of low-cost, open-source hardware and facilitate a new avenue for conservation researchers to perform large-scale monitoring.

Indexed as

acousticsbioacousticsconservationecologymachine learning

Identifiers

PMID30699950
PMCPMC6387379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.