Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30699303›Full record

ArticlePublic health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)

Application of an Implementation Science Framework to Policies on Immediate Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception.

Carla L DeSisto, Charlan D Kroelinger, Cameron Estrich, Alisa Velonis, Keriann Uesugi, David A Goodman, Ellen Pliska, Sanaa Akbarali, Kristin M Rankin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Immediate Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: Review of Insertion and Device Reimbursement Policies.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Carla L DeSisto1 Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9065-7070
Charlan D Kroelinger2 Division of Reproductive Health, Field Support Branch, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Chamblee, GA, USA.
Cameron Estrich3 Division of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Alisa Velonis3 Division of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Keriann Uesugi1 Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
David A Goodman4 Division of Reproductive Health, Maternal Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Chamblee, GA, USA.
Ellen Pliska5 Association of State and Territorial Health Officials, Arlington, VA, USA.
Sanaa Akbarali5 Association of State and Territorial Health Officials, Arlington, VA, USA.
Kristin M Rankin1 Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

OSTLTS CDC HHS U38 OT000161
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesImplementation science provides useful tools for guiding and evaluating the integration of evidence-based interventions with standard practice. The objective of our study was to demonstrate the usefulness of applying an implementation science framework-the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)-to increase understanding of implementation of complex statewide public health initiatives, using the example of Medicaid immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) policies.

methodsWe conducted semistructured telephone interviews with the 13 state teams participating in the Immediate Postpartum LARC Learning Community. We asked teams to describe the implementation facilitators, barriers, and strategies in 8 focus areas of the Learning Community. We audio-recorded and transcribed interviews and then coded each interview according to the domains and constructs (ie, theoretical concepts) of the CFIR.

resultsCosmopolitanism (ie, networking with external organizations) was the most frequently coded construct of the framework. A related construct was networks and communications (ie, the nature and quality of social networks and formal and informal communications in an organization). Within the construct of cost, state teams identified barriers that were often unable to be overcome. Trialability (ie, ability to test the intervention on a small scale) and engaging champions (ie, attracting and involving persons who dedicate themselves to supporting the intervention in an organization) were among the most salient constructs of the framework and were the sources of many implementation strategies.

conclusionsState leaders and program staff members may benefit from considering the CFIR domains and constructs in the planning, implementation, and evaluation of complex statewide public health initiatives.

Indexed as

Implementation ScienceMedicaidPostpartum PeriodPublic Health PracticeFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicLong-Acting Reversible ContraceptionSocial NetworkingUnited StatesConsolidated Framework for Implementation Researchcontraceptionimplementation sciencelong-acting reversible contraception

Identifiers

PMID30699303
PMCPMC6410478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.