Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30699156›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Quality of family planning services in Mexico: The perspective of demand.

Pilar Torres-Pereda, Ileana B Heredia-Pi, Midiam Ibáñez-Cuevas, Leticia Ávila-Burgos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Assessing the continuum of care for maternal health in Mexico, 1994-2018.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2021
    Article
  7. Government Expenditure on Maternal Health and Family Planning Services for Adolescents in Mexico, 2003-2015.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pilar Torres-PeredaCenter for Health Systems Research, National Institute of Public Health Mexico, Cuernavaca Morelos, México.
Ileana B Heredia-PiCenter for Health Systems Research, National Institute of Public Health Mexico, Cuernavaca Morelos, México.ORCID 0000-0002-9998-9239
Midiam Ibáñez-CuevasCenter for Health Systems Research, National Institute of Public Health Mexico, Cuernavaca Morelos, México.
Leticia Ávila-BurgosCenter for Health Systems Research, National Institute of Public Health Mexico, Cuernavaca Morelos, México.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFamily planning (FP) is one of the key services provided by health care systems. Extending beyond matters of sexual and reproductive health, its area of influence impacts directly on the development of individuals and nations. After 60 years of intense FP activities in Mexico, and in light of recent restructuring of health service supply and financing, services need to be assessed from a user perspective.

objectiveBased on a comprehensive conceptual framework, this article assesses the quality of the FP services provided by the Mexican Ministry of Health (MoH). Analysis considers not only accessibility and availability but also the users' perceptions of the care process, particularly as regards the interpersonal relations they experience with staff and the type of information they are provided. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis study used a descriptive, qualitative design based on maximum variation sampling in six Mexican states. It included visits to 12 clinics in urban and rural areas. Thematic analysis was performed on 86 semi-structured interviews administered to FP service users.

resultsWhile access was described by users as "easy," their experiences revealed normalized barriers. One of our key findings referred to inverse availability, meaning that the contraceptive methods available were generally not the ones preferred by users, with their selection therefore being shaped by shortage of supplies. Challenges included disrespect for the free choice of FP users and coercion during consultations for contraception post obstetric event. Finally, information provided to users left considerable room for improvement.

conclusionsAfter six decades of FP service supply, results indicate a series of quality issues that may lie at the heart of the unmet demand reported in the literature. Based on a comprehensive conceptual scheme, the present study analyzes the quality of services, highlighting areas for improvement that should be considered by the MoH in future efforts.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultContraceptionCounselingFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHealth PlanningHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMexicoMiddle AgedPregnancyProfessional-Patient RelationsProgram EvaluationQuality of Health Care

Identifiers

PMID30699156
PMCPMC6353096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.