ArticlePloS one2019
Regenerative capacity in the lamprey spinal cord is not altered after a repeated transection.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modeling Release Scaffolds for Spinal Cord Tissue Regeneration After Injury Using COMSOL Simulation.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Fusogen-induced recovery of spinal cord function and morphology after complete transection.PloS one · 2026Article
- Mechanisms underpinning spontaneous spinal cord regeneration.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2025Review
- Animal Models of Spinal Cord Injury.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Spontaneous regeneration of cholecystokinergic reticulospinal axons after a complete spinal cord injury in sea lampreys.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- Proprioceptive feedback amplification restores effective locomotion in a neuromechanical model of lampreys with spinal injuries.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Integrative biology of injury in animals.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2023Review
- The salamander blastema within the broader context of metazoan regeneration.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Review
- A Reproducible Spinal Cord Crush Injury in the Regeneration-Permissive Axolotl.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Lampreys and spinal cord regeneration: "a very special claim on the interest of zoologists," 1830s-present.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Article
- Full regeneration of descending corticotropin-releasing hormone axons after a complete spinal cord injury in lampreys.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- Swimming kinematics and performance of spinal transected lampreys with different levels of axon regeneration.The Journal of experimental biology · 2021Article
- Review
- Article
- Source of Early Regenerating Axons in Lamprey Spinal Cord Revealed by Wholemount Optical Clearing with BABB.Cells · 2020Article
- Activated Erk Is an Early Retrograde Signal After Spinal Cord Injury in the Lamprey.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The resilience of regeneration in vertebrates is not very well understood. Yet understanding if tissues can regenerate after repeated insults, and identifying limitations, is important for elucidating the underlying mechanisms of tissue plasticity. This is particularly challenging in tissues, such as the nervous system, which possess a large number of terminally differentiated cells and often exhibit limited regeneration in the first place. However, unlike mammals, which exhibit very limited regeneration of spinal cord tissues, many non-mammalian vertebrates, including lampreys, bony fishes, amphibians, and reptiles, regenerate their spinal cords and functionally recover even after a complete spinal cord transection. It is well established that lampreys undergo full functional recovery of swimming behaviors after a single spinal cord transection, which is accompanied by tissue repair at the lesion site, as well as axon and synapse regeneration. Here we begin to explore the resilience of spinal cord regeneration in lampreys after a second spinal transection (re-transection). We report that by all functional and anatomical measures tested, lampreys regenerate after spinal re-transection just as robustly as after single transections. Recovery of swimming, synapse and cytoskeletal distributions, axon regeneration, and neuronal survival were nearly identical after spinal transection or re-transection. Only minor differences in tissue repair at the lesion site were observed in re-transected spinal cords. Thus, regenerative potential in the lamprey spinal cord is largely unaffected by spinal re-transection, indicating a greater persistent regenerative potential than exists in some other highly regenerative models. These findings establish a new path for uncovering pro-regenerative targets that could be deployed in non-regenerative conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.