Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30698858›Full record

ArticleJournal of traumatic stress2019

An Online Educational Program for Individuals With Dissociative Disorders and Their Clinicians: 1-Year and 2-Year Follow-Up.

Bethany L Brand, Hugo J Schielke, Karen T Putnam, Frank W Putnam, Richard J Loewenstein, Amie Myrick, Ellen K K Jepsen, Willemien Langeland, Kathy Steele, Catherine C Classen and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of traumatic stress, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.

Bethany L BrandDepartment of Psychology, Towson University, Towson, Maryland, USA.
Hugo J SchielkeCalifornia Department of State Hospitals, Napa, California, USA.
Karen T PutnamThe Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina School of Medicine at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Frank W PutnamThe Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina School of Medicine at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Richard J LoewensteinSheppard Pratt Health System and University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Amie MyrickFamily and Children's Services, Bel Air, Maryland.
Ellen K K JepsenModum Bad Psychiatric Center, Vikersund, Norway.
Willemien LangelandBascous, France.
Kathy SteeleAtlanta, Georgia.
Catherine C ClassenUniversity of California San Francisco and Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California, USA.
Ruth A LaniusWestern University, London, Ontario, Canada.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USBASF (France) · FRFamily & Children’s Services · USGeorgia Christian University · USModum Bad – Gordon Johnsens stiftelse · NONapa State Hospital · USSan Francisco General Hospital · USSheppard Pratt Health System · USTowson University · USWestern University · CA

Funding

ANS Research, Towson University, and numerous generous donors including Anne Bartoletto and family, Michael Hemmer, and Brad Foote
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals with dissociative disorders (DDs) are underrecognized, underserved, and often severely psychiatrically ill, characterized by marked dissociative and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms with significant disability. Patients with DD have high rates of nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) and suicide attempts. Despite this, there is a dearth of training about DDs. We report the outcome of a web-based psychoeducational intervention for an international sample of 111 patients diagnosed with dissociative identity disorder (DID) or other complex DDs. The Treatment of Patients with Dissociative Disorders Network (TOP DD Network) program was designed to investigate whether, over the course of a web-based psychoeducational program, DD patients would exhibit improved functioning and decreased symptoms, including among patients typically excluded from treatment studies for safety reasons. Using video, written, and behavioral practice exercises, the TOP DD Network program provided therapists and patients with education about DDs as well as skills for improving emotion regulation, managing safety issues, and decreasing symptoms. Participation was associated with reductions in dissociation and PTSD symptoms, improved emotion regulation, and higher adaptive capacities, with overall sample |d|s = 0.44-0.90, as well as reduced NSSI. The improvements in NSSI among the most self-injurious patients were particularly striking. Although all patient groups showed significant improvements, individuals with higher levels of dissociation demonstrated greater and faster improvement compared to those lower in dissociation |d|s = 0.54-1.04 vs. |d|s  = 0.24-0.75, respectively. These findings support dissemination of DD treatment training and initiation of treatment studies with randomized controlled designs.

Indexed as

AdultCognitive Behavioral TherapyDissociative DisordersEducation, DistanceEmotional RegulationFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSelf-Injurious BehaviorStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticSuicide, Attempted

Identifiers

PMID30698858
PMCPMC6590319
OpenAlexW2911431845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.