Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30698755›Full record

ArticleJournal of pediatric psychology2019

Developing Machine Learning Models for Behavioral Coding.

April Idalski Carcone, Mehedi Hasan, Gwen L Alexander, Ming Dong, Susan Eggly, Kathryn Brogan Hartlieb, Sylvie Naar, Karen MacDonell, Alexander Kotov

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pediatric psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

April Idalski CarconeWayne State University.
Mehedi HasanWayne State University.
Gwen L AlexanderHenry Ford Health System.
Ming DongWayne State University.
Susan EgglyWayne State University and Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute.
Kathryn Brogan HartliebFlorida International University.
Sylvie NaarFlorida State University.
Karen MacDonellWayne State University.
Alexander KotovWayne State University.
Wayne State University · USFlorida International University · USFlorida State University · USHenry Ford Health System · USThe Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Scientific Core (ETR)U19HD089875 · NICHD · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI NAAR, SYLVIE · 2016 to 2021
$21.4M
Development of an MI Implementation Intervention in Adolescent HIV Care SettingsR34MH103049 · NIMH · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MACDONELL, KAREN, NAAR, SYLVIE · 2015 to 2017
$710k
Automated Coding of eCoaching Exchanges to Promote Healthier EatingR21DK108071 · NIDDK · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CARCONE, APRIL MARIE IDALSKI, KOTOV, ALEXANDER · 2016 to 2017
$425k
NICHD NIH HHS U19 HD089875NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK108071NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH103049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe goal of this research is to develop a machine learning supervised classification model to automatically code clinical encounter transcripts using a behavioral code scheme.

methodsWe first evaluated the efficacy of eight state-of-the-art machine learning classification models to recognize patient-provider communication behaviors operationalized by the motivational interviewing framework. Data were collected during the course of a single weight loss intervention session with 37 African American adolescents and their caregivers. We then tested the transferability of the model to a novel treatment context, 80 patient-provider interactions during routine human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) clinic visits.

resultsOf the eight models tested, the support vector machine model demonstrated the best performance, achieving a .680 F1-score (a function of model precision and recall) in adolescent and .639 in caregiver sessions. Adding semantic and contextual features improved accuracy with 75.1% of utterances in adolescent and 73.8% in caregiver sessions correctly coded. With no modification, the model correctly classified 72.0% of patient-provider utterances in HIV clinical encounters with reliability comparable to human coders (k = .639).

conclusionsThe development of a validated approach for automatic behavioral coding offers an efficient alternative to traditional, resource-intensive methods with the potential to dramatically accelerate the pace of outcomes-oriented behavioral research. The knowledge gained from computer-driven behavioral research can inform clinical practice by providing clinicians with empirically supported communication strategies to tailor their conversations with patients. Lastly, automatic behavioral coding is a critical first step toward fully automated eHealth/mHealth (electronic/mobile Health) behavioral interventions.

Indexed as

CommunicationMotivational InterviewingProfessional-Patient RelationsAdolescentBehavioral ResearchFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleQualitative ResearchReproducibility of ResultsSupport Vector Machinemachine learningmotivational interviewingqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID30698755
PMCPMC6415657
OpenAlexW2912048951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.