ArticleJournal of pediatric psychology2019
Developing Machine Learning Models for Behavioral Coding.
Article in Journal of pediatric psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Natural language processing for mental health interventions: a systematic review and research framework.Translational psychiatry · 2023Pooled it
- Capitalizing on natural language processing (NLP) to automate the evaluation of coach implementation fidelity in guided digital cognitive-behavioral therapy (GdCBT).Psychological medicine · 2025Trial
- Automated Behavioral Coding to Enhance the Effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing in a Chat-Based Suicide Prevention Helpline: Secondary Analysis of a Clinical Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Opening the Black Box of Family-Based Treatments: An Artificial Intelligence Framework to Examine Therapeutic Alliance and Therapist Empathy.Clinical child and family psychology review · 2023Article
- What constitutes victims of toxicity - identifying drivers of toxic victimhood in multiplayer online battle arena games.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Prediction of Chinese clients' satisfaction with psychotherapy by machine learning.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Automatic rating of therapist facilitative interpersonal skills in text: A natural language processing application.Frontiers in digital health · 2022Article
- Improving Mental Health Services: A 50-Year Journey from Randomized Experiments to Artificial Intelligence and Precision Mental Health.Administration and policy in mental health · 2020Article
- Introduction to the Coordinated Special Issue on eHealth/mHealth in Pediatric Psychology.Journal of pediatric psychology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe goal of this research is to develop a machine learning supervised classification model to automatically code clinical encounter transcripts using a behavioral code scheme.
methodsWe first evaluated the efficacy of eight state-of-the-art machine learning classification models to recognize patient-provider communication behaviors operationalized by the motivational interviewing framework. Data were collected during the course of a single weight loss intervention session with 37 African American adolescents and their caregivers. We then tested the transferability of the model to a novel treatment context, 80 patient-provider interactions during routine human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) clinic visits.
resultsOf the eight models tested, the support vector machine model demonstrated the best performance, achieving a .680 F1-score (a function of model precision and recall) in adolescent and .639 in caregiver sessions. Adding semantic and contextual features improved accuracy with 75.1% of utterances in adolescent and 73.8% in caregiver sessions correctly coded. With no modification, the model correctly classified 72.0% of patient-provider utterances in HIV clinical encounters with reliability comparable to human coders (k = .639).
conclusionsThe development of a validated approach for automatic behavioral coding offers an efficient alternative to traditional, resource-intensive methods with the potential to dramatically accelerate the pace of outcomes-oriented behavioral research. The knowledge gained from computer-driven behavioral research can inform clinical practice by providing clinicians with empirically supported communication strategies to tailor their conversations with patients. Lastly, automatic behavioral coding is a critical first step toward fully automated eHealth/mHealth (electronic/mobile Health) behavioral interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.