Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30698722›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2019

Racial/Ethnic Differences in Lung Cancer Incidence in the Multiethnic Cohort Study: An Update.

Daniel O Stram, S Lani Park, Christopher A Haiman, Sharon E Murphy, Yesha Patel, Stephen S Hecht, Loic Le Marchand

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. The Multiethnic Cohort: A Resource for the Study of Genetic and Nongenetic Cancer Risk across Populations.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Lung cancer screening: are race- and risk-aware criteria needed?Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2026
    Article
  9. Addressing algorithmic bias in lung cancer screening eligibility.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniel O StramSee the Notes section for the full list of authors' affiliations.
S Lani ParkSee the Notes section for the full list of authors' affiliations.
Christopher A HaimanSee the Notes section for the full list of authors' affiliations.
Sharon E MurphySee the Notes section for the full list of authors' affiliations.
Yesha PatelSee the Notes section for the full list of authors' affiliations.
Stephen S HechtSee the Notes section for the full list of authors' affiliations.
Loic Le MarchandSee the Notes section for the full list of authors' affiliations.

Funding

Understanding Population Differences in Cancer: The MEC StudyU01CA164973 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI HAIMAN, CHRISTOPHER ALAN, LE MARCHAND, LOIC · 2015 to 2025
$37.4M
Untargeted Adductomics to Characterize Ethnic Differences in the Exposome of SmokersP01CA138338 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Daniel O Stram · 2010 to 2026
$33.4M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA138338NCI NIH HHS U01 CA164973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe previously found that African Americans and Native Hawaiians were at highest lung cancer risk compared with Japanese Americans and Latinos; whites were midway in risk. These differences were more evident at relatively low levels of smoking intensity, fewer than 20 cigarettes per day (CPD), than at higher intensity.

methodsWe apportioned lung cancer risk into three parts: age-specific background risk (among never smokers), an excess relative risk term for cumulative smoking, and modifiers of the smoking effect: race and years-quit smoking. We also explored the effect of replacing self-reports of CPD with a urinary biomarker-total nicotine equivalents-using data from a urinary biomarker substudy.

resultsTotal lung cancers increased from 1979 to 4993 compared to earlier analysis. Estimated excess relative risks for lung cancer due to smoking for 50 years at 10 CPD (25 pack-years) ranged from 21.9 (95% CI = 18.0 to 25.8) for Native Hawaiians to 8.0 (95% CI = 6.6 to 9.4) for Latinos over the five groups. The risk from smoking was higher for squamous cell carcinomas and small cell cancers than for adenocarcinomas. Racial differences consistent with earlier patterns were seen for overall cancer and for cancer subtypes. Adjusting for predicted total nicotine equivalents, Japanese Americans no longer exhibit a lower risk, and African Americans are no longer at higher risk, compared to whites. Striking risk differences between Native Hawaiians and Latinos persist.

conclusionsRacial differences in lung cancer risk persist in the Multiethnic Cohort study that are not easily explained by variations in self-reported or urinary biomarker-measured smoking intensities.

Indexed as

EthnicityRacial GroupsAgedAsianBlack or African AmericanFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNative Hawaiian or Pacific IslanderRisk FactorsSmoking

Identifiers

PMID30698722
PMCPMC6695313
OpenAlexW2911771361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.