ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2019
Elective Deliveries and Neonatal Outcomes in Full-Term Pregnancies.
Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neonatal and maternal outcomes at early vs. full term following induction of labor; A secondary analysis of the OBLIGE randomized trial.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2024Trial
- The Association Between Experiencing Racial Discrimination and Delivery Method Among Women in the United States, PRAMS 2016-2021.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- Trends in Elective Deliveries in California and New Jersey.AJPM focus · 2023Article
- Prenatal diagnosis of fetal defects and its implications on the delivery mode.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2023Review
- Elective Deliveries and the Risk of Autism.American journal of preventive medicine · 2022Article
- State-level structural sexism and cesarean sections in the United States.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cesarean and induced delivery rates have risen substantially in recent decades and currently account for over one-third and one-fourth of US births, respectively. Initiatives to encourage delaying deliveries until a gestational age of 39 weeks appear to have slowed the increases but have not led to declines. The rates are at historic highs and the consequences of these interventions when not medically necessary have not been systematically explored at the population level. In this study, we used population-level data on births in New Jersey (1997-2011) to document trends in elective deliveries (induced vaginal delivery, cesarean delivery with no labor trial, and cesarean delivery after induction) and estimate logistic and linear regression models of associations between delivery method and neonatal morbidities and cost-related outcomes in low-risk pregnancies. We found that elective deliveries more than doubled during the observation period and were associated with neonatal morbidities and cost-related outcomes even at gestational ages of 39 and 40 weeks. Findings suggest that delaying beyond 39 weeks and avoiding delivery interventions when not medically necessary would improve infant health and reduce health-care costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.