ArticleJournal of occupational health2019
Bermuda grass pollen allergen implicated in clinically relevant cross-reactivity to multiple grains: A case report.
Article in Journal of occupational health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bermuda grass pollen allergen implicated in clinically relevant cross-reactivity to multiple grains: A case report.Journal of occupational health · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnaphylaxis is a severe and potentially fatal type of allergic reaction and is characterized by the rapid development of symptoms in the respiratory and circulatory systems, possibly leading to death if not treated properly. Occupational anaphylaxis, which does not exhibit significant differences in pathogenesis from the nonoccupational form, develops in response to work-related triggers. However, the onset of occupational anaphylaxis can also be triggered by other factors. Therefore, an unexpected episode may occur due to exposure to a previously sensitized antigen or cross-reaction in the occupational environment, even if the direct trigger has been removed. Accordingly, it is difficult to diagnosis and treat such cases and ensure avoidance of potential triggers. CASE PRESENTATION: An adult male patient developed anaphylaxis following exposure to grass antigens while replacing and burying sewer pipes at a theme park. He later developed cross-reactivity to other grains. Despite symptomatic treatment, his total serum level of allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (Ig E) antibodies continuously increased, and thus, he was admitted with severe hypersensitivity, at which time his serum levels of Ig E antibodies specific for Bermuda grass, wheat, and rice had also increased.
conclusionIn Korea, Bermuda grass is rarely seen and is generally found in athletic fields or theme parks. Following exposure to this relatively rare grass, our patient exhibited new anaphylactic responses to various external antigens. Therefore, we attribute his severe anaphylaxis to sensitization caused by Bermuda grass exposure and cross-reactive hypersensitivity to other grains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.