Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30698218›Full record

Observational studyRevista latino-americana de enfermagem2019

Risk assessment for perioperative pressure injuries.

Camila de Assunção Peixoto, Maria Beatriz Guimarães Ferreira, Márcia Marques Dos Santos Felix, Patrícia da Silva Pires, Elizabeth Barichello, Maria Helena Barbosa

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05549830 (The Effect of Different Positioning Before, During and After Surgery on Pressure Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05549830 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Different Positioning Before, During and After Surgery on Pressure Injury: a Randomized Controlled Study Protocol

TypeinterventionalSponsorMarmara UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled100ConditionsPressure Injury, InjuriesArmsPatient Positioning
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Camila de Assunção PeixotoUniversidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Instituto de Ciências da Saúde, Uberaba, MG, Brazil.
Maria Beatriz Guimarães FerreiraUniversidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Instituto de Ciências da Saúde, Uberaba, MG, Brazil.
Márcia Marques Dos Santos FelixUniversidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Instituto de Ciências da Saúde, Uberaba, MG, Brazil.
Patrícia da Silva PiresUniversidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Instituto de Ciências da Saúde, Uberaba, MG, Brazil.
Elizabeth BarichelloUniversidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Instituto de Ciências da Saúde, Uberaba, MG, Brazil.
Maria Helena BarbosaUniversidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Instituto de Ciências da Saúde, Uberaba, MG, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2749-2802

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesto evaluate and classify patients according to the Risk Assessment Scale for Perioperative Pressure Injuries; verify the association between sociodemographic and clinical variables and the risk score; and identify the occurrence of pressure injuries due to surgical positioning.

methodobservational, longitudinal, prospective and quantitative study carried out in a teaching hospital with 278 patients submitted to elective surgeries. A sociodemographic and clinical characterization questionnaire and the Risk Assessment Scale for Perioperative Pressure Injuries were used. Descriptive, bivariate and logistic regression analyses were applied.

resultsthe majority of patients (56.5%) presented a high risk for perioperative pressure injury. Female sex, elderly group, and altered body mass index values were statistically significant (p < 0.05) for a higher risk of pressure injuries. In 77% of the patients, there were perioperative pressure injuries.

conclusionmost of the participants presented a high risk for development of perioperative decubitus ulcers. The female sex, elderly group, and altered body mass index were significant factors for increased risk. The Risk Assessment Scale for Perioperative Pressure Injuries allows the early identification of risk of injury, subsidizing the adoption of preventive strategies to ensure the quality of perioperative care.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient PositioningPerioperative CarePerioperative NursingPostoperative ComplicationsPressure UlcerRisk AssessmentSocioeconomic FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30698218
PMCPMC6336361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.