Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30698187›Full record

ArticleLab on a chip2019

A microfluidic platform for the characterisation of membrane active antimicrobials.

K Al Nahas, J Cama, M Schaich, K Hammond, S Deshpande, C Dekker, M G Ryadnov, U F Keyser

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lab on a chip, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Ion Permeability of DNA Nanotube Channels.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. To Close or to Collapse: The Role of Charges on Membrane Stability upon Pore Formation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

K Al NahasCavendish Laboratory, Univ. of Cambridge, JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0HE, UK. ufk20@cam.ac.uk.
J Cama
M Schaich
K Hammond
S Deshpande
C Dekker
M G Ryadnov
U F Keyser
University of Cambridge · GBKavli Energy NanoScience Institute · USNational Physical Laboratory · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spread of bacterial resistance against conventional antibiotics generates a great need for the discovery of novel antimicrobials. Polypeptide antibiotics constitute a promising class of antimicrobial agents that favour attack on bacterial membranes. However, efficient measurement platforms for evaluating their mechanisms of action in a systematic manner are lacking. Here we report an integrated lab-on-a-chip multilayer microfluidic platform to quantify the membranolytic efficacy of such antibiotics. The platform is a biomimetic vesicle-based screening assay, which generates giant unilamellar vesicles (GUVs) in physiologically relevant buffers on demand. Hundreds of these GUVs are individually immobilised downstream in physical traps connected to separate perfusion inlets that facilitate controlled antibiotic delivery. Antibiotic efficacy is expressed as a function of the time needed for an encapsulated dye to leak out of the GUVs as a result of antibiotic treatment. This proof-of-principle study probes the dose response of an archetypal polypeptide antibiotic cecropin B on GUVs mimicking bacterial membranes. The results of the study provide a foundation for engineering quantitative, high-throughput microfluidics devices for screening antibiotics.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCell MembraneDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalInsect ProteinsMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesUnilamellar LiposomesAnti-Bacterial Agentscecropin B protein, InsectaInsect ProteinsUnilamellar Liposomes

Identifiers

PMID30698187
PMCPMC6404476
OpenAlexW2913551752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.