Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30697672›Full record

ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2019

Striatal-frontal network activation during voluntary task selection under conditions of monetary reward.

Joseph M Orr, Michael J Imburgio, Jessica A Bernard, Marie T Banich

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Reward systems, cognition, and emotion: Introduction to the special issue.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joseph M OrrDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, 515 Coke Street, College Station, TX, 77843-4235, USA. joseph.orr@tamu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6539-339X
Michael J ImburgioDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, 515 Coke Street, College Station, TX, 77843-4235, USA.
Jessica A BernardDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, 515 Coke Street, College Station, TX, 77843-4235, USA.
Marie T BanichInstitute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA.
Texas A&M University · USUniversity of Colorado Boulder · US

Funding

Proj 5: Early Development (224-250)P50MH079485 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI MUNAKATA, YUKO · 2008 to 2012
$8.7M
Organization and timecourse of the neural mechanisms for cognitive flexibilityF32DA034412 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI ORR, JOSEPH M. · 2013 to 2015
$122k
NIDA NIH HHS F32 DA034412NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH079485
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During voluntary task selection, a number of internal and external biases may guide such a choice. However, it is not well understood how reward influences task selection when multiple options are possible. To address this issue, we examined brain activation in a voluntary task-switching paradigm while participants underwent fMRI (n = 19). To reinforce the overall goal to choose the tasks randomly, participants were told of a large bonus that they would receive at the end of the experiment for making random task choices. We also examined how occasional, random rewards influenced both task performance and brain activation. We hypothesized that these transient rewards would increase the value of the just-performed task, and therefore bias participants to choose to repeat the same task on the subsequent trial. Contrary to expectations, transient reward had no consistent behavioral effect on subsequent task choice. Nevertheless, the receipt of such rewards did influence activation in brain regions associated with reward processing as well as those associated with goal-directed control. In addition, reward on a prior trial was found to influence activation during task choice on a subsequent trial, with greater activation in a number of executive function regions compared with no-reward trials. We posit that both the random presentation of transient rewards and the overall task bonus for random task choices together reinforced the goal to choose the tasks randomly, which in turn influenced activation in both reward-related regions and those regions involved in abstract goal processing.

Indexed as

Brain MappingRewardAdultChoice BehaviorCorpus StriatumExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePrefrontal CortexPsychomotor PerformanceYoung AdultCognitive controlDecision-makingPrefrontal cortexReward

Identifiers

PMID30697672
PMCPMC6599477
OpenAlexW2951625181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.