ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2018
A comparative evaluation between dermatoglyphic patterns and different terminal planes in primary dentition.
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Associations Between Dermatoglyphic Patterns and Oral Diseases in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cureus · 2025Review
- Article
- A short review on the root canal configuration of primary maxillary molars.Bioinformation · 2020Article
- Single visit versus multiple visit root canal.Bioinformation · 2020Article
- A study of correlation of cheiloscopy, fingerprint patterns and palatoscopy in skeletal malocclusions.Revista cientifica odontologica (Universidad Cientifica del Sur)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo assess the correlation between different dermatoglyphic patterns with the terminal planes in deciduous dentition. MATERIAL AND
methods300 children who are 3-6 years old with complete primary dentition were recruited and the pattern of molar terminal plane was recorded in the proforma. Finger prints of the distal phalanges of these subjects were recorded using ink and roller method and were analysed for the finger print pattern by a forensic specialist. The pattern were classified based on classification given by Galton. The finger ridge counts were also measured.
resultsUlnar loop pattern was the most predominant dermatoglyphic pattern. Absence of arch pattern in ring and little fingers of left hand and higher ridge count in left little finger when compared to the right hand were related to Mesial step. Presence of whorl pattern in both right and left middle finger and higher total finger ridge count in left hand when compared to the right hand were related to distal step. Flush terminal plane was related to absence of arc pattern in ring finger of left hand.
conclusionsDermatoglyphics can be used as a non invasive analytical tool to predict the terminal plane in primary dentition.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.