ArticleEvolutionary applications2019
Complex problems need detailed solutions: Harnessing multiple data types to inform genetic management in the wild.
Article in Evolutionary applications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors Affecting Multiple Paternity: Insights From the Eastern Quoll (Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Boost or Bust? The Impact of Supplementation on Functional Genetic Diversity and Selective Processes in Tasmanian Devils.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- The Devil Is in the Details: Assessing Temporal Changes in Genetic Diversity Across Managed and Unmanaged Sites.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Temporal Changes in Tasmanian Devil Genetic Diversity at Sites With and Without Supplementation.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Restoring faith in conservation action: Maintaining wild genetic diversity through the Tasmanian devil insurance program.iScience · 2022Article
- Global Commitments to Conserving and Monitoring Genetic Diversity Are Now Necessary and Feasible.Bioscience · 2021Article
- Darwin, the devil, and the management of transmissible cancers.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2021Article
- Curse of the devil: molecular insights into the emergence of transmissible cancers in the Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii).Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2020Review
- A comparison of pedigree, genetic and genomic estimates of relatedness for informing pairing decisions in two critically endangered birds: Implications for conservation breeding programmes worldwide.Evolutionary applications · 2020Article
- Inbreeding depression in one of the last DFTD-free wild populations of Tasmanian devils.PeerJ · 2020Article
- Review
- From reference genomes to population genomics: comparing three reference-aligned reduced-representation sequencing pipelines in two wildlife species.BMC genomics · 2019Article
- Complex problems need detailed solutions: Harnessing multiple data types to inform genetic management in the wild.Evolutionary applications · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For bottlenecked populations of threatened species, supplementation often leads to improved population metrics (genetic rescue), provided that guidelines can be followed to avoid negative outcomes. In cases where no "ideal" source populations exist, or there are other complicating factors such as prevailing disease, the benefit of supplementation becomes uncertain. Bringing multiple data and analysis types together to plan genetic management activities can help. Here, we consider three populations of Tasmanian devil,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.