ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2019
Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Serum Peptidomic Analysis in a Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Benjakul Remedy Versus Loratadine in Allergic Rhinitis Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Bioactive-RichBiomedicines · 2026Article
- Mechanistic Insights into the Therapeutic Potential of Phytochemicals Against Stress-Induced Gastric Ulcer.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Review
- Phytochemical Analysis and Antioxidant Activities of Various Extracts from the Aerial Part ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Investigation of the relationship between university students' attentional impulsivity levels and psychological and physiological stress responses.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2024Article
- Characterization and Bioactive Potential of Secondary Metabolites Isolated fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Potential Active Constituents fromPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Is cognitive ability a factor in explaining differences in physiological and psychological stress responses?Archives of medical science : AMS · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMATERIAL AND
methodsThe methanolic extract of PS was prepared in the dose of 500 mg/kg. Twenty-eight male Wistar rats were assigned to 4 equal sized groups: two control groups and two treated groups which were supplemented with either PS or OMZ orally at a dose of 500 mg/kg and 20 mg/kg body weight respectively. After 28 days of treatment, one control group, the PS and OMZ group were subjected to a single exposure of water-immersion restraint stress for 3.5 h. After the last exposure to stress, the stomach was excised for evaluation of the parameters.
resultsOral supplementation of PS was as effective in preventing the formation of gastric lesion when compared with OMZ (
conclusions
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.