ReviewFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2018
Cerebellum, Predictions and Errors.
Review in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
107 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 189 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation on balance and gait in patients with multiple sclerosis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2023Pooled it
- Explicit and Implicit Emotion Processing in the Cerebellum: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2023Pooled it
- Predictive and instructive cerebellar encoding of dopamine reward drives motivated behavior.Nature neuroscience · 2026Article
- Subthreshold violations of trajectory predictions are sensitive to TMS of cerebellum Crus I/II.Neuroimage. Reports · 2026Article
- Brain-AI convergence: Generative world models and hierarchical attention for human intelligence.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Review
- Sensorimotor circuit connectivity as a candidate biomarker for responsiveness to sertraline in obsessive-compulsive disorder.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026Article
- Decoding Psychosis Risk: Neuroanatomical Correlates of the NAPLS-2 Calculator in the PRONIA Cohort.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2026Article
- Biochemical Pathways of Neuroplasticity in Sport Skill Acquisition: From Neuroscience to Coaching Practice.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Investigating Cerebello-Cortical Networks With EEG: Advances and Future Challenges.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Review
- The cerebro-cerebellar system: Integrative roles in motor control, cognition, and neuropsychiatric disorders.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2026Review
- Cerebellar growth is associated with domain-specific cerebral maturation and socio-linguistic behavior.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Motor, Cognitive, Psychological, and Neural Predictors of Concern About Falling in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis.Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · 2026Article
- Perceptual prediction error supports implicit process in motor learning.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Lateral Cerebellum Enhances Prediction During Manual Tracking of a Moving Visual Target.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Article
- Neural subtypes in developmental stuttering.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Exploring the Potential of Scales to Assess Different Types of Ataxia: Meta-review.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Review
- Consensus Paper: Models of Cerebellar Functions.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Review
- Cerebellar Purkinje cell firing reduction contributes to aging-related declining motor coordination in mice.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Robot-Assisted Mirror Therapy for Upper Limb and Hand Recovery After Stroke: Clinical Efficacy and Insights into Neural Mechanisms.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- A brief history of dopamine prediction errors.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026Review
47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Making predictions and validating the predictions against actual sensory information is thought to be one of the most fundamental functions of the nervous system. A growing body of evidence shows that the neural mechanisms controlling behavior, both in motor and non-motor domains, rely on prediction errors, the discrepancy between predicted and actual information. The cerebellum has been viewed as a key component of the motor system providing predictions about upcoming movements and receiving feedback about motor errors. Consequentially, studies of cerebellar function have focused on the motor domain with less consideration for the wider context in which movements are generated. However, motor learning experiments show that cognition makes important contributions to motor adaptation that involves the cerebellum. One of the more successful theoretical frameworks for understanding motor control and cerebellar function is the forward internal model which states that the cerebellum predicts the sensory consequences of the motor commands and is involved in computing sensory prediction errors by comparing the predictions to the sensory feedback. The forward internal model was applied and tested mainly for effector movements, raising the question whether cerebellar encoding of behavior reflects task performance measures associated with cognitive involvement. Electrophysiological studies based on pseudo-random tracking in monkeys show that the discharge of Purkinje cell, the sole output neurons of the cerebellar cortex, encodes predictive and feedback signals not only of the effector kinematics but also of task performance. The implications are that the cerebellum implements both effector and task performance forward models and the latter are consistent with the cognitive contributions observed during motor learning. The implications of these findings include insights into recent psychophysical observations on moving with reduced feedback and motor learning. The findings also support the cerebellum's place in hierarchical generative models that work in concert to refine predictions about behavior and the world. Therefore, cerebellar representations bridge motor and non-motor domains and provide a better understanding of cerebellar function within the functional architecture of the brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.