Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30697071›Full record

ArticleCancer management and research2019

Outcome and prognostic factors following palliative craniospinal irradiation for leptomeningeal carcinomatosis.

Rami A El Shafie, Karina Böhm, Dorothea Weber, Kristin Lang, Fabian Schlaich, Sebastian Adeberg, Angela Paul, Matthias F Haefner, Sonja Katayama, Florian Sterzing and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer management and research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A systematic review of craniospinal irradiation for leptomeningeal disease: past, present, and future.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in gastric cancer: a single-center retrospective analysis of 86 cases.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Prognostic factors of meningeal carcinomatosis in breast cancer patients.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rami A El ShafieDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, rami.elshafie@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Karina BöhmDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, rami.elshafie@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Dorothea WeberInstitute of Medical Biometry and Informatics (IMBI), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.
Kristin LangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, rami.elshafie@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Fabian SchlaichDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, rami.elshafie@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Sebastian AdebergDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, rami.elshafie@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Angela PaulDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, rami.elshafie@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Matthias F HaefnerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, rami.elshafie@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Sonja KatayamaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, rami.elshafie@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Florian SterzingDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, rami.elshafie@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Juliane Hörner-RieberDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, rami.elshafie@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Sarah LöwDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.
Klaus HerfarthDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, rami.elshafie@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Jürgen DebusDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, rami.elshafie@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Stefan RiekenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, rami.elshafie@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Denise BernhardtDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, rami.elshafie@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Heidelberg University · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLeptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC) is a severe complication of metastatic tumor spread to the central nervous system. Prognosis is dismal with a median overall survival (OS) of ~10-15 weeks. Treatment options include radiotherapy (RT) to involved sites, systemic chemo- or targeted therapy, intrathecal chemotherapy and best supportive care with dexamethasone. Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) is a more aggressive radiotherapeutic approach, for which very limited data exists. Here, we report on our 10-year experience with palliative CSI of selected patients with LC. PATIENTS AND

methodsTwenty-five patients received CSI for the treatment of LC at our institution between 2008 and 2018. Patients were selected individually for CSI based on clinical performance, presenting symptoms and estimated benefit. Median patient age was 53 years (IQR: 45-59), and breast cancer was the most common primary. Additional brain metastases were found in 18 patients (72.0%). RT was delivered at a TomoTherapy machine, using helical intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). The most commonly prescribed dose was 36 Gy in 20 fractions, corresponding to a median biologically equivalent dose of 40.8 Gy (IQR: 39.0-2.5). Clinical performance and neurologic function were assessed before and in response to therapy, and deficits were retrospectively quantified on the 5-point neurologic function scale (NFS). A Cox proportional hazards model with univariate and multivariate analyses was fitted for survival.

resultsTwenty-one patients died and four were alive at the time of analysis. Median OS from LC diagnosis was 19.3 weeks (IQR: 9.3-34.0, 95% CI: 11.0-32.0). In univariate analysis, a Karnofsky performance scale index (KPI) ≥70% (

conclusionCSI for the treatment of LC is feasible and may have therapeutic value in carefully selected patients, alleviating symptoms or delaying neurologic deterioration. OS after CSI was comparable to the rates described in current literature for patients with LC. The use of modern irradiation techniques such as helical IMRT is warranted to limit toxicity. Patient selection should take into account prognostic factors such as age, clinical performance, neurologic function and the availability of systemic treatment options.

Indexed as

carcinomatous meningitisleptomeningeal metastasesneuroaxisneurologic functionradiotherapyTomoTherapy

Identifiers

PMID30697071
PMCPMC6340499
OpenAlexW2910548158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.