Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30697036›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2019

Comparison of anonymous versus nonanonymous responses to a medication adherence questionnaire in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Tino Prell, Denise Schaller, Caroline Perner, Gabriele Helga Franke, Otto W Witte, Albrecht Kunze, Julian Grosskreutz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tino PrellDepartment of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany, tino.prell@med.uni-jena.de.
Denise SchallerDepartment of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany, tino.prell@med.uni-jena.de.
Caroline PernerDepartment of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany, tino.prell@med.uni-jena.de.
Gabriele Helga FrankeUniversity of Applied Sciences, Psychology of Rehabilitation, Stendal, Germany.
Otto W WitteDepartment of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany, tino.prell@med.uni-jena.de.
Albrecht KunzeDepartment of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany, tino.prell@med.uni-jena.de.
Julian GrosskreutzDepartment of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany, tino.prell@med.uni-jena.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAdherence to medication can be assessed by various self-report questionnaires. One could hypothesize that survey respondents tend to answer questions in a manner that will be viewed favorably by others. We aimed to answer if anonymous and nonanonymous responses to a questionnaire on medication adherence differ. PATIENTS AND

methodsAdherence was assessed with the German Stendal Adherence with Medication Score (SAMS), which includes 18 questions with responses based on a 5-point Likert scale. Anonymous data from 40 subjects were collected during a symposium for patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), and nonanonymous data were obtained from 40 outpatient-clinic PD patients at the Department of Neurology.

resultsThe two groups (anonymous self-reported questionnaire and nonanonymous) did not differ in terms of demographical characteristics and the SAMS sum score. However, anonymously collected data showed significant higher scoring for the item 6 ("Do you forget your medications?") than the data collected nonanonymously (

conclusionOverall assessment of adherence does not depend on whether the patient remains anonymous or not. There seems to be no relevant social desirability bias in nonanonymous responses.

Indexed as

adherence questionnaireanonymousnonadherenceParkinson’s diseaseself-report

Identifiers

PMID30697036
PMCPMC6342145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.