Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30696894›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

A Fast and Refined Cancer Regions Segmentation Framework in Whole-slide Breast Pathological Images.

Zichao Guo, Hong Liu, Haomiao Ni, Xiangdong Wang, Mingming Su, Wei Guo, Kuansong Wang, Taijiao Jiang, Yueliang Qian

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. SVPath: A Deep Learning Tool for Analysis of Stria Vascularis from Histology Slides.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zichao GuoBeijing Key Laboratory of Mobile Computing and Pervasive Device, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China.
Hong LiuBeijing Key Laboratory of Mobile Computing and Pervasive Device, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China. hliu@ict.ac.cn.
Haomiao NiBeijing Key Laboratory of Mobile Computing and Pervasive Device, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China.
Xiangdong WangBeijing Key Laboratory of Mobile Computing and Pervasive Device, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China.
Mingming SuResearch Center for Big Data of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100005, China.
Wei GuoDepartment of Pathology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410013, China.
Kuansong WangDepartment of Pathology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410013, China. 13787146109@126.com.
Taijiao JiangResearch Center for Big Data of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100005, China. taijiao@ibms.pumc.edu.cn.
Yueliang QianBeijing Key Laboratory of Mobile Computing and Pervasive Device, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Supervised learning methods are commonly applied in medical image analysis. However, the success of these approaches is highly dependent on the availability of large manually detailed annotated dataset. Thus an automatic refined segmentation of whole-slide image (WSI) is significant to alleviate the annotation workload of pathologists. But most of the current ways can only output a rough prediction of lesion areas and consume much time in each slide. In this paper, we propose a fast and refined cancer regions segmentation framework v3_DCNN, which first preselects tumor regions using a classification model Inception-v3 and then employs a semantic segmentation model DCNN for refined segmentation. Our framework can generate a dense likelihood heatmap with the 1/8 side of original WSI in 11.5 minutes on the Camelyon16 dataset, which saves more than one hour for each WSI compared with the initial DCNN model. Experimental results show that our approach achieves a higher FROC score 83.5% with the champion's method of Camelyon16 challenge 80.7%. Based on v3 DCNN model, we further automatically produce heatmap of WSI and extract polygons of lesion regions for doctors, which is very helpful for their pathological diagnosis, detailed annotation and thus contributes to developing a more powerful deep learning model.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBreastBreast NeoplasmsDeep LearningFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerSupervised Machine Learning

Identifiers

PMID30696894
PMCPMC6351543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.