Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30696722›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2019

Bridge: Person-Centered Collaborative Care for Patients with Serious Mental Illness and Cancer.

Kelly E Irwin, Elyse R Park, Lauren E Fields, Amy E Corveleyn, Joseph A Greer, Giselle K Perez, Catherine A Callaway, Jamie M Jacobs, Andrew A Nierenberg, Jennifer S Temel and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Collaborative care approaches for people with severe mental illness.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Bipolar disorder in oncology: Considerations for the psychiatrist.Journal of mood and anxiety disorders · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Consultation models in psychosocial oncology.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kelly E IrwinDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts kirwin1@partners.org.
Elyse R ParkMongan Institute for Health Policy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Lauren E FieldsDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Amy E CorveleynDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Joseph A GreerDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Giselle K PerezDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Catherine A CallawayDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jamie M JacobsDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Andrew A NierenbergDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jennifer S TemelDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
David P RyanDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
William F PirlDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USBenson-Henry Institute · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Reducing Disparities in Underserved Patients with Cancer and Serious Mental IllnessK08CA230185 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI IRWIN, KELLY EDWARDS · 2018 to 2022
$1.1M
Examining Delivery of Integrated Tobacco Treatment in Cancer CareK24CA197382 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI PARK, ELYSE R. · 2015 to 2019
$841k
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA230185NCI NIH HHS K24 CA197382
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividuals with serious mental illness (SMI) experience increased cancer mortality due to inequities in cancer treatment. Psychiatric care at cancer diagnosis may improve care delivery, yet models for integrating psychiatry and cancer care are lacking. We assessed the feasibility and acceptability of a person-centered collaborative care trial for SMI and cancer. SUBJECTS, MATERIALS, AND

methodsWe developed the Bridge intervention for patients with SMI (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and severe major depression) and cancer. Bridge includes proactive identification of SMI, person-centered care from a psychiatrist and case manager, and collaboration with oncology. We conducted a 12-week, single-group trial in patients with SMI and a new breast, gastrointestinal, lung, or head/neck cancer. We assessed the feasibility of patient identification, enrollment and study completion; evaluated acceptability and perceived benefit with exit interviews with patients, caregivers, and oncology clinicians; and examined change in psychiatric symptoms with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS).

resultsFrom November 2015 to April 2016, 30/33 eligible patients (90.9%) enrolled, and 25/29 (86.2%) completed assessments at all timepoints, meeting feasibility criteria. Of 24 patients, 23 (95.8%) found meeting with the psychiatrist helpful; 16/19 caregivers (84.2%) shared that Bridge addressed key caregiving challenges. Oncology clinicians evaluated Bridge as "very" or "most" useful for 94.3% of patients. Exit interviews with all participant groups suggested that Bridge fostered patient-clinician trust, increased access to psychiatric treatment, and enabled patients to initiate and complete cancer treatment. Psychiatric symptoms on the BPRS improved from baseline to 12 weeks.

conclusionBridge is a feasible and acceptable care delivery model for patients with SMI, their caregivers, and oncology clinicians. Randomized trials are warranted to assess the efficacy of improving cancer outcomes in this underserved population. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Serious mental illness affects 13 million U.S. adults who experience increased cancer mortality. To improve outcomes, new models of integrated oncology and mental health care are urgently needed. This study found that it was feasible to identify, enroll, and retain patients with serious mental illness and a new cancer in a trial of integrated mental health and cancer care (Bridge). Patients, caregivers, and oncologists reported that Bridge facilitated the initiation and completion of cancer care. Randomized trials are warranted to investigate the impact on cancer outcomes. Trial procedures may inform consent, engagement, and trial retention for patients with mental illness.

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CareQuality of LifeSeverity of Illness IndexCooperative BehaviorFeasibility StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPatient-Centered CarePrognosisSelf CareDelivery of health careHealth care disparitiesPsycho‐oncologySchizophreniaVulnerable populations

Identifiers

PMID30696722
PMCPMC6656464
OpenAlexW2912196777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.