Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30696678›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Life satisfaction, job satisfaction, life orientation and occupational burnout among nurses and midwives in medical institutions in Poland: a cross-sectional study.

Izabella Uchmanowicz, Stanisław Manulik, Katarzyna Lomper, Anna Rozensztrauch, Agnieszka Zborowska, Jolanta Kolasińska, Joanna Rosińczuk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Izabella UchmanowiczDepartment of Clinical Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5452-0210
Stanisław ManulikDepartment of Nervous System Diseases, Faculty of Health Sciences, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Katarzyna LomperDepartment of Clinical Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Anna RozensztrauchDepartment of Neonatology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Agnieszka ZborowskaDepartment of Clinical Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Jolanta KolasińskaDepartment of Clinical Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Joanna RosińczukDepartment of Nervous System Diseases, Faculty of Health Sciences, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess life satisfaction, job satisfaction, life orientation and the level of professional burnout in a group of professionally active nurses and midwives.

designA cross-sectional study.

settingThis study was conducted between March and October of 2017 during specialisation training at the European Centre for Postgraduate Education in Wroclaw, Poland.

participantsA group of 350 professionally active nurses (n=293) and midwives (n=57) were enrolled in the study. OUTCOME MEASURES: Associations between burnout and selected life-related and job-related outcomes using (1) the Satisfaction With Job Scale, (2) the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS), (3) the Life Orientation Test-Revised, (4) the Maslach Burnout Inventory and the Authors' Designed Questionnaire regarding sociodemographic factors. The level of statistical significance was set at p≤0.05 (with a CI of 95%).

resultsThe vast majority of participants were those in the ages of 41-50 years old (40.57%), women (96.86%) and people with bachelor's degree (46.29%). The average overall rate for occupational burnout was 34.67 per 100 points. Assessment of occupational burnout subscale showed that the most significant factor was emotional exhaustion at 39.14 points (SD=28.15). Job satisfaction, life satisfaction and life orientation assessed with SWLS significantly affects each of the occupational burnout subscales (p<0.05).

conclusionsThe level of occupational burnout in nurses and midwives appeared to be low. It has been revealed that such determinants as life satisfaction, job satisfaction and life orientation do not allow for developing an occupational burnout.

Indexed as

Job SatisfactionPersonal SatisfactionAdultBurnout, ProfessionalCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMidwiferyNursesPolandYoung Adultburnout componentsburnout syndromecross-sectional studyhealth-care providersjob satisfactionlife satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID30696678
PMCPMC6352840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.