ArticleBMJ open2019
Role of intuitive knowledge in the diagnostic reasoning of hospital specialists: a focus group study.
Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Understanding the role of GPs' gut feelings in diagnosing cancer in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis of existing evidence.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020Pooled it
- Article
- Infection point of care tests bridge the experience gap of antibiotic STOP decisions: clinicians versus students.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2026Observational
- The Enduring Promise of Personalising Patient Preference Prediction.Neuroethics · 2026Review
- Enhancing Cognitive Reflection in Medical Trainees and Physicians: An EBM-CBL-PBL Integrated Teaching Model.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
- The role of AI and personalized medicine in healthcare: balancing technological advancements and the art of medicine.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Physicians' appraisal of parental concerns: a qualitative assessment.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025Article
- Evidence-Based Medicine: Past, Present, Future.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Prognostic predictions in psychosis: exploring the complementary role of machine learning models.BMJ mental health · 2025Article
- Quantify difference between physicians and medical students in clinical reasoning: evidence from eye-tracking.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Discrepancies Between Physician-Perceived and Calculated Cardiovascular Risk in Primary Prevention: Implications for LDL-C Target Achievement and Appropriate Lipid-Lowering Therapy.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2025Article
- Diagnosing intuition: a phenomenological account of intuitive knowledge in clinical practice.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Review
- Acute internal medicine physicians' clinical intuition based on acute care telephone referral: A prospective study.PloS one · 2024Article
- Article
- Digital health understanding and preparedness of medical students: a cross-sectional study.Medical education online · 2022Article
- Patients' gut feelings seem useful in primary care professionals' decision making.BMC primary care · 2022Article
- Integrating Clinical Signs at Presentation and Clinician's Non-analytical Reasoning in Prediction Models for Serious Bacterial Infection in Febrile Children Presenting to Emergency Department.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- Creation of clinical algorithms for decision-making in oncology: an example with dose prescription in radiation oncology.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021Review
- A Set of Eight Key Questions Helps to Classify Common Vestibular Disorders-Results From the DizzyReg Patient Registry.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- Value of parental concern and clinician's gut feeling in recognition of serious bacterial infections: a prospective observational study.BMC pediatrics · 2019Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveIntuition is an important part of human decision-making and can be explained by the dual-process theory where analytical and non-analytical reasoning processes continually interact. These processes can also be identified in physicians' diagnostic reasoning. The valuable role of intuition, including gut feelings, has been shown among general practitioners and nurses, but less is known about its role among hospital specialists. This study focused on the diagnostic reasoning of hospital specialists, how they value, experience and use intuition. DESIGN AND
participantsTwenty-eight hospital specialists in the Netherlands and Belgium participated in six focus groups. The discussions were recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematically coded. A circular and iterative analysis was applied until data saturation was achieved.
resultsDespite initial reservations regarding the term intuition, all participants agreed that intuition plays an important role in their diagnostic reasoning process. Many agreed that intuition could guide them, but were cautious not to be misguided. They were especially cautious since intuition does not have probative force, for example, in medicolegal situations. 'On-the-job experience' was regarded as a precondition to relying on intuition. Some participants viewed intuition as non-rational and invalid. All participants said that intuitive hunches must be followed by analytical reasoning. Cultural differences were not found. Both the doctor as a person and his/her specialty were seen as important determinants for using intuition.
conclusionsHospital specialists use intuitive elements in their diagnostic reasoning, in line with general human decision-making models. Nevertheless, they appear to disagree more on its role and value than previous research has shown among general practitioners. A better understanding of how to take advantage of intuition, while avoiding pitfalls, and how to develop 'skilled' intuition may improve the quality of hospital specialists' diagnostic reasoning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.