Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30696670›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Inhaler technique education in elderly patients with asthma or COPD: impact on disease exacerbations-a protocol for a single-blinded randomised controlled trial.

Tiago Maricoto, Jaime Correia-de-Sousa, Luís Taborda-Barata

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03449316 (Inhaler Technique Education in Elderly Patients With Asthma or COPD), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03449316 phase4unknown statusnot on this map

Inhaler Technique Education in Elderly Patients With Asthma or COPD: Impact on Disease Exacerbations - a Protocol for a Single-blinded Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAveiro-Aradas Family Health UnitRan2018 to 2019Enrolled146ConditionsAsthma, COPDArmsInhaler technique education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tiago MaricotoAveiro-Aradas Family Health Unit, Aveiro Health Centre, Aveiro, Portugal.
Jaime Correia-de-SousaLife and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS)/3B's-PT Government Associate Laboratory, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.
Luís Taborda-BarataCICS-Health Sciences Research Centre; NuESA-Environment & Health Study Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Covilha, Portugal.
Health Sciences Centre · CAUniversity of Beira Interior · PTUniversity of Minho · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)and asthma affect more than 10% of the population. Most patients use their inhaler incorrectly, mainly the elderly, thereby becoming more susceptible to poor clinical control and exacerbations. Placebo device training is regarded as one of the best teaching methods, but there is scarce evidence to support it as the most effective one to improve major clinical outcomes. Our objective is to perform a single-blinded RCT to assess the impact of this education tool in these patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A multicentre single-blinded Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) will be set up, comparing an inhaler education programme with a teach-to-goal placebo-device training versus usual care, with a 1-year follow-up, in patients above 65 years of age with asthma or COPD. Intervention will be provided at baseline, and after 3 and 6 months, with interim analysis at an intermediate time point. Exacerbation rates were set as primary outcomes, and quality of life, adherence rates, clinical control and respiratory function were chosen as secondary outcomes. A sample size of 146 participants (73 in each arm) was estimated as adequate to detect a 50% reduction in event rates. Two-sample proportions χ² test will be used to study primary outcome and subgroup analysis will be carried out according to major baseline characteristics. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Every participant will sign a written consent form. A Data Safety Monitoring Board will be set up to evaluate data throughout the study and to monitor early stopping criteria. Identity of all participants will be protected. This protocol was approved on 22 November 2017 by the local Ethics Committee of University of Beira Interior, with the reference number CE-UBI-Pj-2017-025. Results will be presented in scientific meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03449316; Pre-Results.

Indexed as

Nebulizers and VaporizersPatient Education as TopicAdministration, InhalationAsthmaBronchodilator AgentsDisease ProgressionHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMedication AdherenceMulticenter Studies as TopicPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSingle-Case Studies as TopicBronchodilator Agentsasthmachronic obstructive pulmonary diseasenebulizers and vaporizers

Identifiers

PMID30696670
PMCPMC6352786
OpenAlexW2911670922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.