Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30696669›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2019

Large care gaps in primary care management of asthma: a longitudinal practice audit.

Courtney Price, Gina Agarwal, David Chan, Sanjeev Goel, Alan G Kaplan, Louis-Philippe Boulet, Muhammad M Mamdani, Sharon E Straus, Gerald Lebovic, Samir Gupta

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01070095 (The Electronic Asthma Action Plan System for Implementation in Primary Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01070095 nacompletednot on this map

The Electronic Asthma Action Plan System for Implementation in Primary Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorUnity Health TorontoRan2012 to 2014Enrolled19ConditionsAsthmaArmsElectronic Asthma Action Plan System
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Inappropriate use of clinical practices in Canada: a systematic review.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. A cluster randomized controlled trial of an electronic medical record-based pathway for pediatric asthma in primary care in Alberta.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Phenotyping treatment-naive uncontrolled asthma in adults: A primary care framework.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Elevating the Importance of Asthma Care in the United States.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2024
    Article
  9. Integrating asthma care guidelines into primary care electronic medical records: a review focused on Canadian knowledge translation tools.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Mobile Health for Asthma.CHEST pulmonary · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Short-acting βNPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Courtney PriceThe Keenan Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Gina AgarwalDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
David ChanDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Sanjeev GoelHealth Quality Innovation Collaborative, Brampton, Ontario, Canada.
Alan G KaplanFamily Physician Airways Group of Canada, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Louis-Philippe BouletInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, Université Laval, Québec, Montreal, Canada.
Muhammad M MamdaniLi Ka Shing Centre for Healthcare Analytics Research and Training (LKS-CHART) Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sharon E StrausThe Keenan Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Gerald LebovicThe Applied Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Samir GuptaThe Keenan Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

CIHR 236225CIHR 322013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCare gaps in asthma may be highly prevalent but are poorly characterised. We sought to prospectively measure adherence to key evidence-based adult asthma practices in primary care, and predictors of these behaviours.

designOne-year prospective cohort study employing an electronic chart audit.

settingThree family health teams (two academic, one community-based) in Ontario, Canada.

participants884 patients (72.1% female; 46.0±17.5 years old) (4199 total visits; 4.8±4.8 visits/patient) assigned to 23 physicians (65% female; practising for 10.0±8.6 years).

main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was the proportion of visits during which practitioners assessed asthma control according to symptom-based criteria. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of: patients who had asthma control assessed at least once; visits during which a controller medication was initiated or escalated; and patients who received a written asthma action plan. Behavioural predictors were established a priori and tested in a multivariable model.

resultsPrimary outcome: Providers assessed asthma control in 4.9% of visits and 15.4% of patients. Factors influencing assessment included clinic site (p=0.019) and presenting symptom, with providers assessing control more often during visits for asthma symptoms (35.0%) or any respiratory symptoms (18.8%) relative to other visits (1.6%) (p<0.01). SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Providers escalated controller therapy in 3.3% of visits and 15.4% of patients. Factors influencing escalation included clinic site, presenting symptom and prior objective asthma diagnosis. Escalation occurred more frequently during visits for asthma symptoms (21.0%) or any respiratory symptoms (11.9%) relative to other visits (1.5%) (p<0.01) and in patients without a prior objective asthma diagnosis (3.5%) relative to those with (1.3%) (p=0.025). No asthma action plans were delivered.

conclusionsMajor gaps in evidence-based asthma practice exist in primary care. Targeted knowledge translation interventions are required to address these gaps, and can be tailored by leveraging the identified behavioural predictors. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01070095; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareAdultAsthmaEvidence-Based PracticeFemaleHealth ServicesHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisOffice VisitsOntarioPractice Patterns, Physicians'Primary Health CareProspective Studiesasthmaknowledge translationprimary carequality in health carerespiratory medicine (see thoracic medicine)

Identifiers

PMID30696669
PMCPMC6352804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.