Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30696474›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2019

Organizational factors associated with target sedation on the first 48 h of mechanical ventilation: an analysis of checklist-ICU database.

Antonio Paulo Nassar, Fernando G Zampieri, Jorge I Salluh, Fernando A Bozza, Flávia Ribeiro Machado, Helio Penna Guimarães, Lucas P Damiani, Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Impact of a multidisciplinary checklist on the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation and length of ICU stay.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Antonio Paulo NassarIntensive Care Unit and Postgraduate Program, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil. paulo.nassar@accamargo.org.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0522-7445
Fernando G ZampieriResearch Institute, HCor-Hospital do Coração, São Paulo, Brazil.
Jorge I SalluhGraduate Program in Translational Medicine and Department of Critical Care, D'Or Institute for Research and Education, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil.
Fernando A BozzaInstituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ), Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Flávia Ribeiro MachadoAnesthesiology, Pain and Intensive Care Department, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Helio Penna GuimarãesResearch Institute, HCor-Hospital do Coração, São Paulo, Brazil.
Lucas P DamianiResearch Institute, HCor-Hospital do Coração, São Paulo, Brazil.
Alexandre Biasi CavalcantiResearch Institute, HCor-Hospital do Coração, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough light sedation levels are associated with several beneficial outcomes for critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation, the majority of patients are still deeply sedated. Organizational factors may play a role on adherence to light sedation levels. We aimed to identify organizational factors associated with a moderate to light sedation target on the first 48 h of mechanical ventilation, as well as the association between early achievement of within-target sedation and mortality.

methodsThis study is a secondary analysis of a multicenter two-phase study (prospective cohort followed by a cluster-randomized controlled trial) performed in 118 Brazilian ICUs. We included all critically ill patients who were on mechanical ventilation 48 h after ICU admission. A moderate to light level of sedation or being alert and calm (i.e., the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale of - 3 to 0) was the target for all patients on mechanical ventilation during the study period. We collected data on the type of hospital (public, private, profit and private, nonprofit), hospital teaching status, nursing and physician staffing, and presence of sedation, analgesia, and weaning protocols. We used multivariate random-effects regression with ICU and study phase as random-effects and correction for patients' Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment. We also performed a mediation analysis to explore whether sedation level was just a mediator of the association between organizational factors and mortality.

resultsWe included 5719 patients. Only 1710 (29.9%) were on target sedation levels on day 2. Board-certified intensivists on the morning and afternoon shifts were associated with an adequate sedation level on day 2 (OR = 2.43; CI 95%, 1.09-5.38). Target sedation levels were associated with reduced hospital mortality (OR = 0.63; CI 95%, 0.55-0.72). Mediation analysis also suggested such an association, but did not suggest a relationship between the physician staffing model and hospital mortality.

conclusionsBoard-certified intensivists on morning and afternoon shifts were associated with an increased number of patients achieving lighter sedation goals. These findings reinforce the importance of organizational factors, such as intensivists' presence, as a modifiable quality improvement target.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBrazilChecklistCohort StudiesDeep SedationFemaleHospital MortalityHumansHypnotics and SedativesIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedOrgan Dysfunction ScoresHypnotics and SedativesConscious sedationCritical careDeep sedationMechanical ventilationOutcome and process assessment

Identifiers

PMID30696474
PMCPMC6352335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.