Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30696444›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2019

Readiness to use telemonitoring in diabetes care: a cross-sectional study among Austrian practitioners.

Domenik Muigg, Peter Kastner, Georg Duftschmid, Robert Modre-Osprian, Daniela Haluza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Workshops as Tools for Developing Collaborative Practice across Professional Social Worlds in Telemonitoring.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Mobile and Online Health Information: Exploring Digital Media Use among Austrian Parents.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The Knowledge, Perception and Utilisation of E-Health among Health Workers in Benin City, Nigeria.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Domenik MuiggCenter for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Institute of Medical, Information Management, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Peter KastnerAIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, Graz, Austria.
Georg DuftschmidCenter for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Institute of Medical, Information Management, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Robert Modre-OsprianAIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, Graz, Austria.
Daniela HaluzaInstitute of Environmental Health, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. daniela.haluza@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0001-5619-2863

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTelemonitoring services could dramatically improve the care of diabetes patients by enhancing their quality of life while decreasing healthcare expenditures. However, the potential for implementing innovative treatment options in the Austrian public and private health system is not known yet. Thus, we analyzed the readiness to use telemonitoring in diabetes care among Austrian practitioners.

methodsWe conducted an online survey among a purposive sample of Austrian practitioners (n = 41) using an adapted German version of the practitioner telehealth readiness assessment tool. We assessed three readiness domains for telemonitoring in the context of diabetes care, i.e. core readiness, engagement readiness, and structural readiness, and validated the German tool using principal components analysis.

resultsStudy subjects perceived themselves as open to innovations and also expressed optimistic attitudes towards telemonitoring in general and offering telemonitoring-based services for their patients. Participants achieved a medium average readiness level for telemonitoring (58.2, 95% CI 53.9-62.5) and were thus in a good position to use telemonitoring, although some arguments may adversely affected its use. The top three perceived benefits of telemonitoring were enhanced quality of treatment, better therapy adjustment, and reduced travel and waiting times for patients. The top three barriers were reduced personal communication, practitioner time expenditure and equally placed poor financial compensation as well as data security and privacy issues.

conclusionOur data revealed that Austrian practitioners showed a quite moderate readiness to use telemonitoring in diabetes care. To further advance telemonitoring readiness among all pillars of diabetes care in Austria, joint efforts among healthcare stakeholders are required to overcome existing financial, organizational, and technical obstacles.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth PersonnelMonitoring, AmbulatoryTelemedicineAdultAgedAustriaCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes MellitusFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesAustriaDiabetes mellitusHealthcare personnelOnline surveyPrincipal components analysisTelecare

Identifiers

PMID30696444
PMCPMC6352347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.