Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30696438›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2019

The picture talk project: Aboriginal community input on consent for research.

Emily Fm Fitzpatrick, Gaynor Macdonald, Alexandra Lc Martiniuk, June Oscar, Heather D'Antoine, Maureen Carter, Tom Lawford, Elizabeth J Elliott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emily Fm FitzpatrickDiscipline of Child and Adolescent Health, Sydney Medical School, the Chidren's Hospital at Westmead, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Emily.fitzpatrick@health.nsw.gov.au.
Gaynor MacdonaldDepartment of Anthropology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Alexandra Lc MartiniukSydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
June OscarMenzies School of Health Research, Darwin, NT, Australia.
Heather D'AntoineNulungu Research Institute, The University of Notre Dame, Broome, Australia.
Maureen CarterNindilingarri Cultural Health Services, Fitzroy Crossing, WA, Australia.
Tom LawfordKimberley Aboriginal Law and Culture Centre, Fitzroy Crossing, Australia.
Elizabeth J ElliottDiscipline of Child and Adolescent Health, Sydney Medical School, the Chidren's Hospital at Westmead, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe consent and community engagement process for research with Indigenous communities is rarely evaluated. Research protocols are not always collaborative, inclusive or culturally respectful. If participants do not trust or understand the research, selection bias may occur in recruitment, affecting study results potentially denying participants the opportunity to provide more knowledge and greater understanding about their community. Poorly informed consent can also harm the individual participant and the community as a whole.

methodsInvited by local Aboriginal community leaders of the Fitzroy Valley, the Kimberley, Western Australia, The Picture Talk project explores the consent process for research. Focus groups of Aboriginal community members were conducted to establish preferences for methods of seeking individual consent. Transcripts were analysed through NVivo10 Qualitative software using grounded theory with inductive and deductive coding. Themes were synthesised with quotes highlighted.

resultsFocus groups with Aboriginal community members (n = 6 focus groups of 3-7 participants) were facilitated by a Community Navigator as a cultural guide and interpreter and a researcher. Participants were recruited from all main language groups of the Fitzroy Valley - Gooniyandi, Walmajarri, Wangkatjungka, Bunuba and Nikinya. Participants were aged ≥18 years, with 5 female groups and one male group. Themes identified include: Reputation and trust is essential; The Community Navigator is key; Pictures give the words meaning - milli milli versus Pictures; Achieving consensus in circles; Signing for consent; and Research is needed in the Valley.

conclusionAboriginal communities of the Fitzroy Valley recommend that researchers collaborate with local leaders, develop trust and foster a good reputation in the community prior to research. Local Aboriginal researchers should be employed to provide cultural guidance throughout the research process and interpret local languages especially for elders. Pictures are preferred to written text to explain research information and most prefer to sign for consent. The Fitzroy Valley welcomes research when collaborative and for the benefit of the community. Future research could include exploring how to support young people, promote health screening and improve understanding of medical knowledge.

Indexed as

Health EducationAdultBiomedical ResearchCommunicationCulturally Competent CareDelivery of Health CareFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth Services, IndigenousHumansInformed ConsentInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative ResearchReview Literature as TopicAboriginalCommunityConsentFocus GroupsIndigenousPicturesQualitative MethodsResearchYarning

Identifiers

PMID30696438
PMCPMC6352438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.