Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30696411›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2019

Process evaluation of a peer-led antenatal breastfeeding class for fathers: perceptions of facilitators and participants.

Lesley Kuliukas, Yvonne L Hauck, Anita Jorgensen, Kelly Kneebone, Sharyn K Burns, Bruce R Maycock, Jane A Scott

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Mixed Method Evaluation of My Vital CyclesInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lesley KuliukasSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia, 6845, Australia.
Yvonne L HauckSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia, 6845, Australia. y.hauck@curtin.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0206-2777
Anita JorgensenSchool of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Kelly KneeboneSchool of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Sharyn K BurnsSchool of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Bruce R MaycockSchool of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Jane A ScottSchool of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Curtin University · AU

Funding

Healthway 24023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Parent Infant Feeding Initiative (PIFI) was a factorial, randomised controlled trial that aimed to prolong exclusive breastfeeding by targeting expecting fathers. One of the intervention strategies evaluated was a father-focused breastfeeding class facilitated by a male peer facilitator. The aim of this mixed-methods descriptive study was to 1) evaluate the feedback provided from participants of the class and 2) explore the motivations and experiences of volunteer male peer facilitators trained to deliver the class.

methodsFather-focused breastfeeding antenatal (FFAB) classes were conducted in six Western Australian hospitals between August 2015 and December 2016. Following each peer facilitated FFAB class, expecting father participants completed an evaluation form to assess their satisfaction with the format, facilitation and content, in addition to whether their expectations and confidence to manage breastfeeding problems had changed. Feedback to open-ended questions was analysed using content analysis to identify learnings and suggestions for improvements. At the completion of PIFI, individual telephone interviews were undertaken with 14 peer facilitators to gain insight into their motivations for volunteering and experiences of conducting the classes. Transcripts from interviews were analysed using Braun and Clarke's six phases for thematic analysis.

resultsParticipant evaluation forms were completed by 678 of the 697 father participants (98%). Overall satisfaction with class format, facilitation and content was high with 90% or more of fathers either strongly agreeing or agreeing with each positively-phrased evaluation item. Class participants enjoyed interacting with other fathers, appreciated validation of their role, were not always aware of the importance of breastfeeding or potential difficulties, valued the anticipatory guidance around what to expect in the early weeks of parenting and appreciated learning practical breastfeeding support strategies. Peer facilitators indicated they felt well prepared and supported to conduct FFAB classes. Analysis of interview transcripts revealed common experiences of the peer facilitators incorporating four themes: 'Highlights of being a facilitator', 'Challenges', 'Mourning the project completion' and 'Satisfaction with training and support'.

conclusionFather-focused breastfeeding classes supported by volunteer male peer facilitators are a feasible and acceptable way of engaging fathers as breastfeeding supporters.

trial registrationACTRN12614000605695 . Registered 6 June 2014.

Indexed as

Peer GroupAdultAttitude to HealthBreast FeedingFathersHealth EducationHumansMaleParentingParentsSocial SupportWestern AustraliaYoung AdultAntenatal classesBreastfeedingFathersMixed-methodsMotivationPeer-supportSatisfactionVolunteers

Identifiers

PMID30696411
PMCPMC6352333
OpenAlexW2921143887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.